← Home

Baransel

📍 Unknown🎬 Baransel
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 36,500 / 10,000 XP
3,500 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
999
ELO
#99
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
997
ELO
#409
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
993
ELO
#443
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
967
ELO
#803
2W 11L · 15%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#509
#509
Season 1
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Mithandrir
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
ARAGORN KING
1W 4L
20%
Mr.Black
1W 4L
20%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Baransel & Mr.Black
1W 4L
20%
Baransel & Mithandrir
2W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
EnemyOfUSA & Pablo.420
1W 2L
33%
lordarg & MAGAA & MrNight
0W 3L
0%
64 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 958
  • Team average: 973 against 987.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 967
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:34:41·2026-10-13 11:51 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 957
  • Team average: 1235 against 1005.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 958
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:32·2026-10-08 18:53 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 958
  • Team average: 949 against 1231.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 957
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:06·2026-10-08 11:59 UTC
LBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 992 against 1041.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 993
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:14:41·2026-10-07 19:26 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1107.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 997
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:42·2026-10-07 19:09 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Team average: 964 against 1219.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 958
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:10·2026-10-06 19:32 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 968
  • Team average: 1064 against 1049.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 959
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:42·2026-10-06 19:01 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Team average: 1013 against 1192.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 968
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:06:45·2026-10-06 18:50 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 970
  • Team average: 961 against 1191.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 969
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:46·2026-10-06 18:28 UTC
LBFME1FFA Crossroads IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Free for all, rated against 1266. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 999
Gondor·FFA·00:24:00·2026-10-06 14:03 UTC