← Home

Odrian

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 35,700 / 10,000 XP
4,300 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
951
ELO
#1087
3W 9L · 25%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
926
ELO
#917
14W 27L · 34%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
890
ELO
#920
5W 24L · 17%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TheDreamer
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Aranruth
1W 4L
20%
Arnor
3W 1L
75%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Arnor & f0rnost & Odrian
3W 1L
75%
fakamaka & Odrian & radju9698
2W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ElDictador & Escu & Laetus77
2W 0L
100%
Arnor & f0rnost & radju9698
0W 2L
0%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Udun IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 896
  • Team average: 938 against 1001.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 890
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:17:06·2026-10-11 08:09 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 928
  • Team average: 1006 against 1137.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 926
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:39·2026-10-10 20:07 UTC
LBFME1Far Harad 2.22How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 901
  • Team average: 957 against 1032.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 896
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:05:39·2026-10-10 19:56 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 918
  • Team average: 976 against 1020.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 928
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:38:48·2026-10-10 17:41 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Team average: 905 against 987.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 918
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:30:30·2026-10-09 12:47 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 930
  • Team average: 1025 against 1068.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 923
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:49·2026-10-09 10:50 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Team average: 1048 against 1009.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 930
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:06·2026-10-09 10:24 UTC
LBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 904
  • Team average: 945 against 1052.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 901
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:07:46·2026-10-09 10:10 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 948
  • Team average: 977 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 940
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:50·2026-10-08 15:54 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 947
  • Team average: 1192 against 1013.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 948
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:27·2026-10-08 15:27 UTC