← Home

radju9698

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 38,320 / 10,000 XP
1,680 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1039
ELO
#102
49W 46L · 52%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
998
ELO
#399
2W 2L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
984
ELO
#354
0W 3L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
975
ELO
#734
0W 3L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Arnor
6W 0L, 100% over 6 games
mk today
9W 11L
45%
WOLFKHIVA
8W 11L
42%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Arnor & f0rnost & radju9698
5W 0L
100%
fakamaka & mk today & radju9698
3W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Beto & CHMAAN & sardor 1997
2W 4L
33%
ElDictador & Escu & Laetus77
5W 0L
100%
61 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1028
  • Team average: 1021 against 1141.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 1039
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:18·2026-10-20 16:18 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1037
  • Team average: 1030 against 1005.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1028
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:54·2026-10-20 16:00 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1044
  • Team average: 1025 against 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1037
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:33·2026-10-20 15:19 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Team average: 981 against 1018.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1044
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:05·2026-10-20 15:04 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1044
  • Team average: 1091 against 1058.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1034
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:31·2026-10-17 16:11 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1040
  • Team average: 1167 against 1062.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1044
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:24·2026-10-17 15:55 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Team average: 1008 against 1072.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1040
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:35:36·2026-10-17 15:14 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1038
  • Team average: 1031 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1030
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:51·2026-10-17 15:00 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1042
  • Team average: 968 against 1064.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1038
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:40·2026-10-17 14:38 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1047
  • Team average: 976 against 1059.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1042
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:50·2026-10-17 14:16 UTC