← Home

Esvagt Baldur

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 37,200 / 10,000 XP
2,800 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#533
#533
Season 2
992 pts
3W / 4L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#765
#765
Season 2
975 pts
2W / 7L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#966
#966
Season 2
880 pts
24W / 63L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#259
#259
Season 2
993 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TheDreamer
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Biedzia
2W 23L
8%
Lord Ziggy
3W 1L
75%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Biedzia & Esvagt Baldur & LITTO
1W 1L
50%
Bali & Biedzia & Esvagt Baldur
0W 2L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
A L S y A f & abod & RONY
1W 1L
50%
Beto & chaman11 & CHMAAN
0W 2L
0%
69 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.7% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 881
  • Team average: 910 against 1146.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 880
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:56·2026-10-06 21:54 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 889
  • Team average: 942 against 968.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 881
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:30:49·2026-10-06 19:52 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 886
  • Team average: 1056 against 942.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 889
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:29·2026-10-06 12:48 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 887
  • Team average: 884 against 1058.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 886
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:57·2026-10-06 11:20 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 890
  • Team average: 981 against 1098.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 887
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:24:49·2026-10-06 08:35 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 881
  • Team average: 1029 against 1035.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 890
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:02·2026-10-05 19:23 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 882
  • Team average: 895 against 1151.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 881
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:06:20·2026-10-05 17:47 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 883
  • Team average: 913 against 1157.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 882
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:36·2026-10-05 13:57 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 887
  • Team average: 940 against 1040.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 883
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:59·2026-10-05 13:32 UTC
LBFME1Fields of Edhellond NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 997 against 1032.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 993
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:28:02·2026-10-04 18:22 UTC