Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
38th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1103
- Team average: 1094 against 1090.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1112
50th ➔ 42nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1086
- Team average: 1094 against 1090.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1095
vs
Losers
100th ➔ 113th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1038
- Team average: 1090 against 1094.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1029
26th ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1142
- Team average: 1090 against 1094.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1133
Winners
21st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1156
- Opponent rating: 1137.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1164
vs
Losers
29th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1137
- Opponent rating: 1156.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1129
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1248
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1251
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1095
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1098
161st ➔ 133rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1003
20th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1065
- Team average: 1102 against 989.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1068
vs
Losers
197th ➔ 257th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 991
133rd ➔ 161st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 999
395th ➔ 401st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 968
300th ➔ 322nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 989 against 1102.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 987
Winners
162nd ➔ 153rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Opponent rating: 956.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1032
vs
Losers
1014th ➔ 1030th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 956
- Opponent rating: 1027.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 951
Winners
35th ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1128
- Opponent rating: 1141.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1137
vs
Losers
28th ➔ 31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1141
- Opponent rating: 1128.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1132
Winners
894th ➔ 761st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 977
- Opponent rating: 1009.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 987
vs
Losers
270th ➔ 366th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Opponent rating: 977.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 999
Winners
115th ➔ 100th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1028
- Team average: 1052 against 1132.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1038
55th ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1076
- Team average: 1052 against 1132.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1086
vs
Losers
35th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1113
- Team average: 1132 against 1052.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1103
22nd ➔ 26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1152
- Team average: 1132 against 1052.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1142
Winners
26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1170
- Team average: 1036 against 939.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1174
135th ➔ 126th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1025
- Team average: 1036 against 939.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1029
888th ➔ 885th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 913
- Team average: 1036 against 939.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 917
vs
Losers
723rd ➔ 744th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 939 against 1036.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 972
833rd ➔ 841st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 947
- Team average: 939 against 1036.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 943
901st ➔ 902nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 896
- Team average: 939 against 1036.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 892
Winners
59th ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1068
- Team average: 1106 against 1078.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1076
26th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1144
- Team average: 1106 against 1078.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1152
vs
Losers
31st ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1121
- Team average: 1078 against 1106.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1113
101st ➔ 115th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1036
- Team average: 1078 against 1106.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1028
Winners
180th ➔ 162nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1021
- Opponent rating: 962.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1027
vs
Losers
992nd ➔ 1014th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 962
- Opponent rating: 1021.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 956
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1244
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1248
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1091
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1095
187th ➔ 161st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 996
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1000
20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Team average: 1098 against 993.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1065
vs
Losers
164th ➔ 197th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 994
123rd ➔ 133rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1002
386th ➔ 395th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 975
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 971
198th ➔ 300th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 993 against 1098.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 990
Winners
39th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1119
- Opponent rating: 1220.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +11.
- Rating after: 1130
vs
Losers
8th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1220
- Opponent rating: 1119.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1209
Winners
980th ➔ 912th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 965
- Opponent rating: 1024.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 975
vs
Losers
176th ➔ 219th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Opponent rating: 965.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1014
Winners
35th ➔ 31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1115
- Team average: 1126 against 1058.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1121
27th ➔ 26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1138
- Team average: 1126 against 1058.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1144
vs
Losers
56th ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Team average: 1058 against 1126.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1068
88th ➔ 101st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1042
- Team average: 1058 against 1126.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1036
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1240
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1244
13th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1087
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1091
241st ➔ 187th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 996
22nd ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1057
- Team average: 1094 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1061
vs
Losers
140th ➔ 164th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 998
171st ➔ 198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 994
81st ➔ 123rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1006
376th ➔ 386th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 979
- Team average: 997 against 1094.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 975
Winners
36th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1106
- Team average: 1085 against 1099.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1115
61st ➔ 56th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1065
- Team average: 1085 against 1099.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1074
vs
Losers
74th ➔ 88th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1051
- Team average: 1099 against 1085.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1042
22nd ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1147
- Team average: 1099 against 1085.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1138
Winners
48th ➔ 43rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Team average: 1045 against 976.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1094
302nd ➔ 260th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 1045 against 976.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1006
vs
Losers
806th ➔ 819th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 953
- Team average: 976 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 948
305th ➔ 367th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 976 against 1045.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 995
Winners
27th ➔ 21st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1147
- Opponent rating: 1137.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1156
vs
Losers
30th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1137
- Opponent rating: 1147.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1128
Winners
118th ➔ 112th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Team average: 1012 against 933.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1032
330th ➔ 282nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 998
- Team average: 1012 against 933.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1003
vs
Losers
699th ➔ 738th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 933 against 1012.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 971
873rd ➔ 875th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 891
- Team average: 933 against 1012.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 886
Winners
8th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1218
- Opponent rating: 1090.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1220
vs
Losers
61st ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1090
- Opponent rating: 1218.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1088
Clan war[HERO] vs [EVIL] · Game 2 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[HERO] 992 → 986 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Clan ratings: 992 against 1104.
- Expected result: 34%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 986
32 × (0 - 0.34) × 0.5 = -6 · #2[EVIL] 1104 → 1110 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1104
- Clan ratings: 1104 against 992.
- Expected result: 66%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1110
32 × (1 - 0.66) × 0.5 = +6 · #1These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
13th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Side average: 1045 against 988.
- Expected result: 58%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1020
40 × (1 - 0.58) × 0.5 = +84th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Side average: 1045 against 988.
- Expected result: 58%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1086
40 × (1 - 0.58) × 0.5 = +8vs
Losers
22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Side average: 988 against 1045.
- Expected result: 42%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 956
40 × (0 - 0.42) × 0.5 = -812th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Side average: 988 against 1045.
- Expected result: 42%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1004
40 × (0 - 0.42) × 0.5 = -8Winners
278th ➔ 81st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Free for all, rated against 946. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1000
vs
Losers
314th ➔ 327th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 987
- Free for all, rated against 992. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 984
383rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 848
- Free for all, rated against 992. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 846
47th ➔ 48th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1005
- Free for all, rated against 992. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1002
Winners
53rd ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Team average: 1012 against 951.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1084
819th ➔ 806th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 947
- Team average: 1012 against 951.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 953
vs
Losers
869th ➔ 873rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 897
- Team average: 951 against 1012.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 891
250th ➔ 304th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 951 against 1012.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1000
Winners
32nd ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1132
- Opponent rating: 1053.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1137
vs
Losers
112th ➔ 123rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1053
- Opponent rating: 1132.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1048
Winners
28th ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1014
- Free for all, rated against 963. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1022
vs
Losers
380th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 902
- Free for all, rated against 1014. Each opponent counts on its own.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 900
269th ➔ 292nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Free for all, rated against 1014. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 990
246th ➔ 277th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Free for all, rated against 1014. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 992
Clan war[HERO] vs [EVIL] · Game 1 of 2War: [EVIL] won 2-0[HERO] 992 → 986 How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Clan ratings: 992 against 1104.
- Expected result: 34%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 986
32 × (0 - 0.34) × 0.5 = -6 · #2[EVIL] 1104 → 1110 How this was worked out- Rating before: 1104
- Clan ratings: 1104 against 992.
- Expected result: 66%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 32.
- These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1110
32 × (1 - 0.66) × 0.5 = +6 · #1These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 50%.Winners
13th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Side average: 1045 against 988.
- Expected result: 58%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1020
40 × (1 - 0.58) × 0.5 = +84th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1078
- Side average: 1045 against 988.
- Expected result: 58%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war won, counts as 1.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1086
40 × (1 - 0.58) × 0.5 = +8vs
Losers
22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Side average: 988 against 1045.
- Expected result: 42%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 956
40 × (0 - 0.42) × 0.5 = -812th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Side average: 988 against 1045.
- Expected result: 42%, where an even match is 50%.
- Result: war lost, counts as 0.
- Step size: 40.
- These players met often this week, so player changes count 50%.
- Rating after: 1004
40 × (0 - 0.42) × 0.5 = -8Winners
27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1146
- Opponent rating: 980.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1147
vs
Losers
864th ➔ 875th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 980
- Opponent rating: 1146.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 979
Winners
200th ➔ 175th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1017
- Opponent rating: 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1024
vs
Losers
793rd ➔ 889th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 984
- Opponent rating: 1017.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 977
Winners
239th ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1002
311th ➔ 171st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 988
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 998
unranked ➔ 81st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1010
400th ➔ 376th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Team average: 987 against 1070.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 979
vs
Losers
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1250
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1240
407th ➔ 418th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 963
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 953
138th ➔ 241st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 992
18th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1067
- Team average: 1070 against 987.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1057













