Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
5th ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 1001 against 999.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1015
35th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1001 against 999.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
37th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 1001 against 999.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1006
vs
Losers
4th ➔ 36th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 999 against 1001.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 998
42nd ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 999 against 1001.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 982
7th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 999 against 1001.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 992
Winners
unranked ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 996 against 993.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
35th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 996 against 993.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1006
40th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 996 against 993.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1000
vs
Losers
3rd ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1010
- Team average: 993 against 996.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1001
60th ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Team average: 993 against 996.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 955
5th ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 993 against 996.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 997
Winners
12th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 1035 against 1006.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1041
21st ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1035 against 1006.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1032
6th ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1050
- Team average: 1035 against 1006.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1058
vs
Losers
126th ➔ 200th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1006 against 1035.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 984
17th ➔ 25th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Team average: 1006 against 1035.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1019
unranked ➔ 136th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1006 against 1035.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
Winners
unranked ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1004 against 1032.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1010
33rd ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1014
- Team average: 1004 against 1032.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1024
unranked ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1004 against 1032.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1010
vs
Losers
34th ➔ 82nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1014
- Team average: 1032 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1004
23rd ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1022
- Team average: 1032 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1012
3rd ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1060
- Team average: 1032 against 1004.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1050
Winners
4th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1053
- Team average: 1025 against 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1060
32nd ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1015
- Team average: 1025 against 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1022
80th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 1025 against 984.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1014
vs
Losers
223rd ➔ 228th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 984 against 1025.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 969
222nd ➔ 227th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 984 against 1025.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 969
87th ➔ 114th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 984 against 1025.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 993
Winners
8th ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1045
- Team average: 1017 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1053
80th ➔ 32nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1007
- Team average: 1017 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1015
112th ➔ 80th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 999
- Team average: 1017 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1007
vs
Losers
199th ➔ 223rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 984
- Team average: 992 against 1017.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 976
76th ➔ 87th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 992 against 1017.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1000
198th ➔ 222nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 984
- Team average: 992 against 1017.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 976
Winners
9th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1037
- Team average: 1009 against 994.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1045
111th ➔ 80th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 999
- Team average: 1009 against 994.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1007
158th ➔ 112th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1009 against 994.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 999
vs
Losers
133rd ➔ 199th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 994 against 1009.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 984
unranked ➔ 134th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 994 against 1009.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
132nd ➔ 198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 994 against 1009.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 984
Winners
19th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1025
- Team average: 1015 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1033
184th ➔ 111th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1015 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 999
12th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 1015 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1037
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 132nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1015.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
unranked ➔ 133rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1015.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
unranked ➔ 134th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1015.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
Winners
vs
Losers
11th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1035
- Opponent rating: 1000.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1025
Winners
18th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Team average: 1009 against 1018.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1035
202nd ➔ 130th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 983
- Team average: 1009 against 1018.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 992
24th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Team average: 1009 against 1018.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1029
vs
Losers
9th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1036
- Team average: 1018 against 1009.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1027
26th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1019
- Team average: 1018 against 1009.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1010
unranked ➔ 187th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1018 against 1009.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
unranked ➔ 77th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1015 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1008
31st ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1018
- Team average: 1015 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1026
13th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Team average: 1015 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1035
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 127th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1015.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
unranked ➔ 128th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1015.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
unranked ➔ 129th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 1015.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
Winners
35th ➔ 31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1000 against 997.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1018
209th ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 1000 against 997.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 991
33rd ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1011
- Team average: 1000 against 997.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1020
vs
Losers
165th ➔ 203rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 997 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 982
unranked ➔ 180th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 997 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
unranked ➔ 181st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 997 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
49th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 988
- Team average: 995 against 995.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 997
7th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 995 against 995.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1010
34th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 995 against 995.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1006
vs
Losers
57th ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Team average: 995 against 995.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 964
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1048
- Team average: 995 against 995.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1039
60th ➔ 61st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 966
- Team average: 995 against 995.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 957
Winners
36th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 996 against 995.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1001
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1039
- Team average: 996 against 995.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1048
61st ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 957
- Team average: 996 against 995.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 966
vs
Losers
34th ➔ 49th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 995 against 996.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 988
56th ➔ 57th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 995 against 996.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 973
4th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 995 against 996.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 997
Winners
56th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Team average: 990 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 982
11th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 990 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
35th ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 990 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1006
vs
Losers
12th ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 988 against 990.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
59th ➔ 61st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 966
- Team average: 988 against 990.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 957
unranked ➔ 49th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 988 against 990.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
46th ➔ 32nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
48th ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
47th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
2nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
61st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
58th ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
2nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
54th ➔ 48th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
53rd ➔ 46th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
35th ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
19th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
59th ➔ 61st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
209th ➔ 186th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 980
- Team average: 992 against 994.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 989
210th ➔ 187th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 980
- Team average: 992 against 994.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 989
29th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1018
- Team average: 992 against 994.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1027
vs
Losers
178th ➔ 201st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 994 against 992.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 982
unranked ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 994 against 992.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
180th ➔ 202nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 994 against 992.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 982
Winners
212th ➔ 209th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 983 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 980
213th ➔ 210th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 983 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 980
53rd ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 983 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1018
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 983.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
unranked ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 983.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
unranked ➔ 180th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 983.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
23rd ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
61st ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
11th ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
5th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
48th ➔ 56th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
54th ➔ 57th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
60th ➔ 56th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
56th ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
47th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
55th ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
4th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
55th ➔ 54th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
58th ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
53rd ➔ 56th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
37th ➔ 48th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
59th ➔ 58th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
54th ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
49th ➔ 54th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
31st ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
unranked ➔ 72nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 999 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
179th ➔ 111th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 987
- Team average: 999 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 996
30th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 999 against 1000.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1021
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 175th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 999.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
unranked ➔ 176th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 999.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
unranked ➔ 177th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1000 against 999.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
45th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
32nd ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
55th ➔ 57th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
46th ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
unranked ➔ 70th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 997 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
unranked ➔ 71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 997 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
119th ➔ 83rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 997 against 988.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1001
vs
Losers
201st ➔ 211th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 974
- Team average: 988 against 997.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 965
156th ➔ 193rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 988 against 997.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 982
unranked ➔ 172nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 988 against 997.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
unranked ➔ 68th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1001 against 1005.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
unranked ➔ 69th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1001 against 1005.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1009
74th ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1003
- Team average: 1001 against 1005.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1012
vs
Losers
28th ➔ 70th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1017
- Team average: 1005 against 1001.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1008
152nd ➔ 191st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1005 against 1001.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 982
68th ➔ 100th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1005 against 1001.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 999
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
59th ➔ 58th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
55th ➔ 54th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
58th ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
46th ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
2nd ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
59th ➔ 58th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
5th ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
36th ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
54th ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
35th ➔ 46th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd ➔ 1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
47th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
55th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
34th ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
58th ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
1st ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
