← Home

Salamanda

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 411,710 / 20,000 XP
8,290 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Men of the West
RotWK
Rohan
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Imladris
RotWK
Show all 12
Lothlorien
RotWK
Harad
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Misty Mountains
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Isengard
BFME1

Ladders

RotWKEdain Unchained · 1 versus 1
1000
ELO
#33
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
994
ELO
#379
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
991
ELO
#537
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKEdain Unchained · 4 versus 4
991
ELO
#18
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKEdain Unchained · 3 versus 3
991
ELO
#40
4W 4L · 50%
RotWKEdain Unchained · 2 versus 2
941
ELO
#129
10W 16L · 38%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
DasAADDD
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Glamdring
2W 9L
18%
johnnyy
3W 5L
38%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Glamdring & Salamanda
2W 6L
25%
johnnyy & Salamanda
3W 3L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Galmod & Glamdring
3W 0L
100%
Giantmind & Glamdring
1W 2L
33%
62 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Imladris·3 versus 3·00:22:00·2026-10-10 20:37 UTC
WRotWKWüstenschrein von HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 932
  • Team average: 965 against 978.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 941
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:19:02·2026-10-10 19:21 UTC
WRotWKSchlachtenhöhen IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Team average: 973 against 977.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 932
Harad·2 versus 2·00:24:02·2026-09-04 19:24 UTC
LRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1055.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Elves·2 versus 2·00:10:54·2026-08-21 22:13 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1002 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:46·2026-08-21 19:52 UTC
WRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lothlorien·3 versus 3·00:24:08·2026-08-20 21:00 UTC
LRotWKWüstenschrein von HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 932
  • Team average: 966 against 968.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 923
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:31:44·2026-08-02 22:29 UTC
LRotWKNördliche Harad StraßeHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Team average: 970 against 986.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 932
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:26:17·2026-07-03 16:47 UTC
LRotWKRinglķs Ebenenen IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 949
  • Team average: 985 against 984.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 940
Lothlorien·2 versus 2·00:20:57·2026-07-02 19:02 UTC
WRotWKWüstenschrein von HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Team average: 972 against 966.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 949
Harad·2 versus 2·00:12:32·2026-07-02 18:44 UTC