← Home

Salamanda

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 190 / 2,000 XP
1,910 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
994
ELO
#394
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

No finished seasons on this patch yet.

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
DasAADDD
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Glamdring
3W 9L
25%
johnnyy
3W 5L
38%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Glamdring & Salamanda
2W 6L
25%
johnnyy & Salamanda
3W 3L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Galmod & Glamdring
3W 0L
100%
Giantmind & Glamdring
1W 2L
33%
62 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 979 against 979.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Dwarves·3 versus 3·00:35:56·2026-11-01 21:38 UTC
WRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 996 against 990.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1000
Rohan·3 versus 3·00:36:01·2026-10-31 16:55 UTC
LRotWKFurten des CirilHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 993 against 993.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 982
Dwarves·4 versus 4·00:38:44·2026-10-30 21:05 UTC
LRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Imladris·3 versus 3·00:22:00·2026-10-10 20:37 UTC
WRotWKWüstenschrein von HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 932
  • Team average: 965 against 978.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 941
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:19:02·2026-10-10 19:21 UTC
WRotWKSchlachtenhöhen IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Team average: 973 against 977.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 932
Harad·2 versus 2·00:24:02·2026-09-04 19:24 UTC
LRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1055.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Elves·2 versus 2·00:10:54·2026-08-21 22:13 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1002 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:46·2026-08-21 19:52 UTC
WRotWKNurn IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lothlorien·3 versus 3·00:24:08·2026-08-20 21:00 UTC
LRotWKWüstenschrein von HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 932
  • Team average: 966 against 968.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 923
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:31:44·2026-08-02 22:29 UTC