← Home

DeimaN

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 530,640 / 40,000 XP
9,360 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Angmar
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Show all 7
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
998
ELO
#337
3W 3L · 50%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#174
#174
Season 1
1,010 pts
14W / 4L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
valll
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Talos_god
12W 11L
52%
UnRo
3W 2L
60%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DeimaN & Talos_god
10W 8L
56%
Belisarius & DeimaN
3W 1L
75%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Gogeta & Matty
0W 4L
0%
UnRo & Zira_aa
2W 1L
67%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 984
  • Team average: 1030 against 992.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 974
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:06:10·2026-02-20 20:45 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:21:27·2026-02-20 16:10 UTC
LRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 989 against 1022.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 984
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:29:11·2026-02-16 20:17 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:01·2026-02-12 20:52 UTC
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:38·2026-02-12 20:34 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:37:57·2026-02-11 21:04 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:13:58·2025-11-11 17:05 UTC
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:15:39·2025-11-08 15:41 UTC
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:06:18·2025-11-08 15:01 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:26:17·2025-11-06 22:04 UTC