← HomeLEVEL
Level 531,450 / 40,000 XP
8,550 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 9
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
3W 3L · 50%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#174
Season 1
1,010 pts
14W / 4L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
valll
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DeimaN & Talos_god
10W 8L
56%
Belisarius & DeimaN
3W 1L
75%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players
LRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out- Rating before: 984
- Team average: 1030 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 974
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:06:10·2026-02-20 20:45 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:21:27·2026-02-20 16:10 UTC 
LRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 989 against 1022.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 984
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:29:11·2026-02-16 20:17 UTC 
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:01·2026-02-12 20:52 UTC 
LRotWKIron MountainsHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:12:38·2026-02-12 20:34 UTC 
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:37:57·2026-02-11 21:04 UTC 
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:13:58·2025-11-11 17:05 UTC 
LRotWKCrossing of PorosHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:15:39·2025-11-08 15:41 UTC
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:06:18·2025-11-08 15:01 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:26:17·2025-11-06 22:04 UTC
