← Home

DeliciousN

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 523,970 / 40,000 XP
16,030 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Angmar
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Show all 7
Mordor
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1051
ELO
#168
18W 2L · 90%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1038
ELO
#57
9W 1L · 90%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#190
#190
Season 1
1,001 pts
31W / 19L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
justiced
6W 1L, 86% over 7 games
justiced
6W 1L
86%
I. Selim
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DeliciousN & justiced
6W 1L
86%
DeliciousN & I. Selim
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ERA9 & l_maga_l
3W 0L
100%
Empyy & JLS.
2W 0L
100%
15 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Team average: 1030 against 966.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1040
Elves·2 versus 2·00:08:14·2026-10-10 10:16 UTC
WRotWKDaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1028
  • Team average: 1024 against 972.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1034
Elves·2 versus 2·00:11:39·2026-10-10 09:55 UTC
WRotWKStonewain ValleyHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1021
  • Team average: 1017 against 979.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1028
Angmar·2 versus 2·00:15:59·2026-10-10 09:35 UTC
WRotWKEryn RhunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1012
  • Team average: 1008 against 1031.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1021
Elves·2 versus 2·00:22:12·2026-10-10 08:43 UTC
WRotWKAnfalas ShoresHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1002
  • Team average: 998 against 1041.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1012
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:07:58·2026-10-10 08:32 UTC
WRotWKPlains of RohanHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Team average: 988 against 1041.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1002
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:13:40·2026-10-10 08:16 UTC
LRotWKEred LithuiHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Team average: 997 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 992
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:18:05·2026-10-10 07:52 UTC
WRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1051
  • Opponent rating: 1132.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1061
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:18:07·2026-10-10 07:25 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1044
  • Opponent rating: 1007.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1051
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:06:52·2026-10-05 14:22 UTC
WRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Opponent rating: 1009.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1044
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:32·2026-10-04 13:51 UTC