← Home

DeliciousN

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 524,550 / 40,000 XP
15,450 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Angmar
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Show all 7
Mordor
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1042
ELO
#184
22W 6L · 79%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1026
ELO
#76
9W 2L · 82%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#190
#190
Season 1
1,001 pts
31W / 19L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
justiced
6W 1L, 86% over 7 games
justiced
6W 1L
86%
I. Selim
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DeliciousN & justiced
6W 1L
86%
DeliciousN & I. Selim
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ERA9 & l_maga_l
3W 0L
100%
Empyy & JLS.
2W 0L
100%
18 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.7% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1042
  • Opponent rating: 1034.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1033
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:09:28·2026-11-02 07:18 UTC
LRotWKFirien DaleHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1043
  • Opponent rating: 997.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1033
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:00:12·2026-11-02 06:51 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1052
  • Opponent rating: 1054.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1043
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:20:28·2026-11-02 06:29 UTC
LRotWKUdunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 1018 against 972.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1026
Elves·2 versus 2·00:12:18·2026-11-01 10:33 UTC
LRotWKErech III-10
Unknown army·1 versus 1·Dodged, no game was played·2026-10-28 16:15 UTC
LRotWKEred LithuiHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Team average: 997 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 992
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:18:05·2026-10-10 07:52 UTC
LRotWKThe Lone-landsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1025
  • Opponent rating: 1073.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1018
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:29:40·2026-08-22 13:20 UTC
LRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1021
  • Opponent rating: 881.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -11.
  • Rating after: 1010
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:15:34·2026-06-14 02:02 UTC
LRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:36:11·2026-04-13 11:00 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves·1 versus 1·00:13:01·2026-03-31 12:36 UTC
vs Gate