← Home

Flexxo

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,080 / 5,000 XP
2,920 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
995
ELO
#408
2W 3L · 40%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
960
ELO
#1665
8W 15L · 35%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
likenet
2W 1L, 67% over 3 games
likenet
2W 1L
67%
Mandarina
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Flexxo & likenet
2W 1L
67%
Flexxo & Mandarina
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
AIRIK00 & sirpisello
2W 0L
100%
Matty & Poero
0W 2L
0%
3 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLostAny queueSolo queueParty games
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 950
  • Opponent rating: 1025.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 960
Elves·1 versus 1·00:19:54·2026-06-14 17:03 UTC
LRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 958
  • Opponent rating: 985.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 950
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:01·2026-06-14 14:41 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Opponent rating: 1107.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 958
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:47·2026-06-05 16:47 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 964
  • Opponent rating: 1035.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 959
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:50·2026-06-05 16:34 UTC
LRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 970
  • Opponent rating: 1029.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 964
Elves·1 versus 1·00:10:13·2026-06-05 16:22 UTC
LRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Team average: 997 against 1088.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 995
Elves·2 versus 2·00:09:41·2026-06-05 16:11 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 973
  • Opponent rating: 1089.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 970
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:10:01·2026-06-05 15:57 UTC
WRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Opponent rating: 880.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 973
Elves·1 versus 1·00:15:14·2026-05-31 14:29 UTC
WRotWKEryn RhunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 995
  • Team average: 1035 against 938.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 999
Elves·2 versus 2·00:14:59·2026-05-31 14:11 UTC
WRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 1031 against 942.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 995
Elves·2 versus 2·00:14:40·2026-05-31 13:54 UTC