← Home

H3xl1on

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 414,140 / 20,000 XP
5,860 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Mordor
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#320
#320
Season 2
1,002 pts
1W / 1L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#441
#441
Season 2
968 pts
1W / 6L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
N3viA
65W 9L, 88% over 74 games
N3viA
65W 9L
88%
Jimbini
1W 7L
12%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
H3xl1on & N3viA
59W 3L
95%
H3xl1on & Jimbini & Morgulrat & N3viA
1W 6L
14%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
AroNd1R & HALBRAND9
3W 0L
100%
DerviSh & Sauromann
2W 0L
100%
55 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 20 games in a row. The Beacons Are Lit · 7 Aug 2026 Flame of Anor · 7 Aug 2026
Flame of Anor
Level 2 of 3
1.7% of players
Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lamedon II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 975
  • Team average: 975 against 1018.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 968
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:31:11·2026-08-29 18:27 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 965 against 1039.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 975
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:09:24·2026-08-29 18:15 UTC
LBFME1Enedwaith II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Team average: 971 against 1023.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 965
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:13:07·2026-08-29 17:58 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Team average: 978 against 1017.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 971
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:21:24·2026-08-29 17:33 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 985
  • Team average: 985 against 1016.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 978
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:18:09·2026-08-29 17:12 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Team average: 992 against 1022.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 985
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:12:53·2026-08-29 16:57 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1023.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:11:16·2026-08-29 16:43 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1011 against 1051.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1002
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:00·2026-08-29 15:41 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 996 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:07·2026-08-29 10:59 UTC
WBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:08:12·2026-03-27 20:47 UTC