← Home

Morgulrat

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 525,120 / 40,000 XP
14,880 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1008
ELO
#244
4W 3L · 57%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
968
ELO
#442
1W 6L · 14%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
N3viA
31W 13L, 70% over 44 games
N3viA
31W 13L
70%
Jimbini
6W 9L
40%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Morgulrat & N3viA
19W 2L
90%
H3xl1on & Jimbini & Morgulrat & N3viA
1W 6L
14%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
GERCULES & LITTO
3W 1L
75%
Furi_ & hetzer99
3W 0L
100%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 50 games with each of 4 different factions in BFME1.
Many Tongues
1.6% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1028 against 988.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1008
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:21·2026-08-29 20:40 UTC
WBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1012
  • Team average: 1022 against 967.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1018
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:57·2026-08-29 20:22 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1006
  • Team average: 1016 against 960.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1012
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:53·2026-08-29 20:03 UTC
LBFME1Lamedon II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 975
  • Team average: 975 against 1018.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 968
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:31:11·2026-08-29 18:27 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 965
  • Team average: 965 against 1039.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 975
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:09:24·2026-08-29 18:15 UTC
LBFME1Enedwaith II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Team average: 971 against 1023.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 965
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:13:07·2026-08-29 17:58 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Team average: 978 against 1017.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 971
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:21:24·2026-08-29 17:33 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 985
  • Team average: 985 against 1016.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 978
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:18:09·2026-08-29 17:12 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Team average: 992 against 1022.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 985
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:12:53·2026-08-29 16:57 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1023.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:11:16·2026-08-29 16:43 UTC