← Home

KJR01

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1960 / 2,000 XP
1,040 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Goblins
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
991
ELO
#188
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
975
ELO
#1337
0W 3L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
917
ELO
#913
0W 12L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
AKRAMGAMER
0W 12L, 0% over 12 games
AKRAMGAMER
0W 12L
0%
Rabin
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
AKRAMGAMER & KJR01
0W 11L
0%
AKRAMGAMER & KJR01 & Rabin
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Chomper & Salorth
0W 3L
0%
Aubergine & BananenBro
0W 2L
0%
9 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 984
  • Opponent rating: 969.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 975
Goblins·1 versus 1·01:12:12·2026-08-29 16:44 UTC
LRotWKRed Desert of KhandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Goblins·3 versus 3·00:09:17·2026-08-29 16:30 UTC
LRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 922
  • Team average: 926 against 1013.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 917
Elves·2 versus 2·00:09:20·2026-08-29 16:09 UTC
LRotWKWoodmen TownHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 928
  • Team average: 932 against 1000.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 922
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:13:21·2026-08-29 13:55 UTC
LRotWKEast CarrockHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 934
  • Team average: 938 against 992.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 928
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:10:58·2026-08-29 13:41 UTC
LRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Opponent rating: 945.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 984
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:19:40·2026-08-29 10:49 UTC
LRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1061.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:21·2026-08-29 10:15 UTC
LRotWKBuckland IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Team average: 944 against 996.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 934
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:11:10·2026-08-28 20:13 UTC
LRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 947
  • Team average: 951 against 995.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 940
Men·2 versus 2·00:08:30·2026-08-28 20:01 UTC
LRotWKAnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 959 against 987.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 947
Goblins·2 versus 2·00:09:29·2026-08-28 19:49 UTC