← Home

Lord VilusTwo Ages of the World

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 24,070 / 5,000 XP
930 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWKMAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Isengard
RotWK
Isengard
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1
Angmar
RotWK
Show all 10
Rohan
BFME1
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
993
ELO
#429
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
971
ELO
#1417
1W 5L · 17%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1247
#1247
Season 1
897 pts
3W / 22L
2026-05-15
Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#987
#987
Season 1
953 pts
1W / 7L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#822
#822
Season 1
936 pts
3W / 12L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#523
#523
Season 1
983 pts
1W / 3L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Yanis
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
DAENERYS
1W 1L
50%
Mohawk
0W 2L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
DAENERYS & Lord Vilus
1W 1L
50%
Lord Vilus & Yanis
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
tom12 & XANZO050
1W 0L
100%
Ganar & ONIONI & Poly91
1W 0L
100%
53 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in each of 2 seasons. The Turning of the Year · 7 Aug 2026 Two Ages of the World · 7 Aug 2026
Two Ages of the World
Level 2 of 2
only 28 players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 978
  • Opponent rating: 1020.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 971
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:58:21·2026-06-14 15:15 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 985
  • Opponent rating: 1018.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 978
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:09:32·2026-06-14 13:18 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Opponent rating: 1040.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 985
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:15:06·2026-05-22 18:57 UTC
LRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1003 against 1052.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 993
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:10:02·2026-05-22 18:44 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Opponent rating: 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 992
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:06:38·2026-05-22 18:35 UTC
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Opponent rating: 951.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1001
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:30:19·2026-05-18 18:17 UTC
LRotWKCardolan HighlandsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1054.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:11·2026-05-18 15:28 UTC
vs Orcy
LRotWKTroll-fellsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:09:53·2026-05-07 15:51 UTC
LRotWKBucklebury FerryHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar·1 versus 1·00:38:30·2026-05-02 17:00 UTC
LRotWKLossarnachHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:43:00·2026-05-02 14:56 UTC