← Home

Luke6193

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 520,890 / 40,000 XP
19,110 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Show all 7
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
1232
ELO
#38
112W 71L · 61%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1129
ELO
#12
31W 15L · 67%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
1018
ELO
#32
2W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
998
ELO
#58
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
966
ELO
#205
4W 8L · 33%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Hosamkh
5W 0L, 100% over 5 games
HaroonZ
4W 2L
67%
ZERO
4W 2L
67%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Luke6193 & ZERO
4W 2L
67%
Hosamkh & Luke6193
4W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
.B.R. & PepitoBR
1W 4L
20%
Hasbulla & Spartaco Gamer
4W 0L
100%
60 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLostAny queueSolo queueParty games
WRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1230
  • Opponent rating: 1100.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1232
 Solo queue
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:38·2026-11-12 23:13 UTC
vs Forg
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1229
  • Opponent rating: 1040.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1230
 Solo queue
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:13·2026-11-12 22:58 UTC
WRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1220
  • Opponent rating: 1213.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1229
 Solo queue
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:55·2026-11-12 22:35 UTC
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1219
  • Opponent rating: 1064.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1220
 Solo queue
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:05·2026-11-11 19:14 UTC
WRotWKFrozen Shallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1212
  • Opponent rating: 1179.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1219
 Solo queue
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:42·2026-11-10 20:17 UTC
WRotWKEast CarrockHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1126
  • Team average: 1052 against 988.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1132
 Solo queue
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:09:43·2026-11-10 16:46 UTC
WRotWKStonewain ValleyHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1120
  • Team average: 1051 against 989.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1126
 Solo queue
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:09:33·2026-11-10 16:34 UTC
WRotWKFirien WoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1114
  • Team average: 1045 against 995.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1120
 Solo queue
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:43·2026-11-10 16:23 UTC
WRotWKNear KhandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1106
  • Team average: 1044 against 1019.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1114
 Solo queue
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:19:13·2026-11-10 15:58 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1207
  • Opponent rating: 1123.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 1212
 Solo queue
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:46·2026-11-09 23:17 UTC