← Home

M_D_M.

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 418,500 / 20,000 XP
1,500 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
981
ELO
#389
2W 5L · 29%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
846
ELO
#975
39W 96L · 29%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#779
#779
Season 1
955 pts
2W / 7L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#718
#718
Season 1
801 pts
25W / 69L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#293
#293
Season 1
938 pts
2W / 9L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
nodir1
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
greyhound
38W 104L
27%
wanderking
37W 103L
26%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
greyhound & M_D_M. & wanderking
27W 59L
31%
M_D_M. & wanderking
1W 4L
20%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
kolya0100 & mashhurbek & sherxan
3W 2L
60%
greyhound & wanderking
1W 3L
25%
68 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 850
  • Team average: 952 against 1041.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 846
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:49·2026-10-30 18:50 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 842
  • Team average: 944 against 916.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 850
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:42·2026-10-30 18:38 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 852
  • Team average: 954 against 927.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 842
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:17·2026-10-30 18:14 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 862
  • Team average: 964 against 917.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 852
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:42·2026-10-30 17:54 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 853
  • Team average: 955 against 965.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 862
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:52·2026-10-30 17:40 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 843
  • Team average: 945 against 973.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 853
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:07·2026-10-30 17:18 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 833
  • Team average: 935 against 1016.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 843
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:02·2026-10-30 17:01 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 834
  • Team average: 936 against 1123.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 833
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:52·2026-10-30 16:32 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 842
  • Team average: 933 against 948.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 834
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:39·2026-10-29 18:31 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 832
  • Team average: 927 against 1000.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 842
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:18·2026-10-29 18:10 UTC