← Home

M_D_M.

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 417,270 / 20,000 XP
2,730 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
981
ELO
#384
2W 5L · 29%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
841
ELO
#961
32W 85L · 27%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#779
#779
Season 1
955 pts
2W / 7L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#718
#718
Season 1
801 pts
25W / 69L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#293
#293
Season 1
938 pts
2W / 9L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
nodir1
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
greyhound
32W 96L
25%
wanderking
30W 94L
24%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
greyhound & M_D_M. & wanderking
21W 52L
29%
M_D_M. & wanderking
1W 4L
20%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
kolya0100 & mashhurbek & sherxan
3W 2L
60%
greyhound & wanderking
1W 3L
25%
68 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 844
  • Team average: 976 against 864.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 847
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:36·2026-10-17 18:15 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 835
  • Team average: 938 against 997.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 845
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:06:46·2026-10-13 17:41 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 832
  • Team average: 946 against 931.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 840
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:06·2026-10-10 19:11 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 823
  • Team average: 937 against 1001.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 833
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:22·2026-10-10 16:58 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 835
  • Team average: 968 against 880.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 839
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:28·2026-10-06 17:40 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 829
  • Team average: 934 against 997.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 839
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:17·2026-10-04 17:17 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 835
  • Team average: 947 against 965.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 844
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:56·2026-09-30 19:10 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 831
  • Team average: 937 against 952.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 840
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:26:37·2026-09-26 18:31 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 832
  • Team average: 938 against 949.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 841
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:34·2026-09-26 17:40 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 822
  • Team average: 928 against 1000.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 832
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:18·2026-09-26 17:30 UTC