← Home

MemHotep

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 414,080 / 20,000 XP
5,920 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#248
1W 0L · 100%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1044
#1044
Season 1
970 pts
6W / 7L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
HADOKEN
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
HADOKEN
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
HADOKEN & MemHotep
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Badura & piterpayn
1W 0L
100%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players
Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WRotWKEnchanted RiverHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:17·2026-02-04 00:43 UTC
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:00:12·2026-02-04 00:20 UTC
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:00:12·2026-02-04 00:19 UTC
WRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:03:58·2026-02-04 00:13 UTC
WRotWKWestfoldHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:03:54·2026-02-04 00:08 UTC
WRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:06:02·2026-02-04 00:00 UTC
WRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:26:15·2026-01-13 17:58 UTC
WRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:34·2026-01-13 17:43 UTC
WRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:22·2026-01-13 17:32 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:29:35·2026-01-13 13:24 UTC