← Home

NacBay

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1960 / 2,000 XP
1,040 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1029
ELO
#126
4W 1L · 80%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
993
ELO
#437
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
980
ELO
#908
2W 5L · 29%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Pablo.420
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Pablo.420
2W 0L
100%
CobraKai
2W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
CobraKai & NacBay & Pablo.420
2W 0L
100%
Aranruth & mashhurbek & NacBay
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
makyyy & Petrolik & TumiCZ
2W 1L
67%
noob777 & SET777 & Super-SubMax
1W 0L
100%
12 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 983
  • Opponent rating: 1093.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 980
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:08:10·2026-09-12 06:59 UTC
LBFME1Gap of Rohan IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1046.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 993
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:18:05·2026-09-10 18:23 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1021
  • Team average: 1024 against 1006.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1029
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:10·2026-09-09 21:13 UTC
WBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1012
  • Team average: 1015 against 1015.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1021
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:13·2026-09-09 20:57 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1017
  • Team average: 941 against 1010.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1012
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:42·2026-09-09 20:44 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 949 against 987.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1017
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:21·2026-09-09 17:49 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Opponent rating: 981.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 983
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:09:35·2026-09-06 17:19 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 992
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:02:19·2026-09-06 14:26 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1129 against 1083.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:22·2026-09-06 13:49 UTC
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Opponent rating: 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1000
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:19·2026-09-06 10:35 UTC