← Home

[PLCZ]PanTomasz

[PLCZ] Sojusz Polsko Czeski · Officer
📍 Poland
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 410,780 / 20,000 XP
9,220 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Mordor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
994
ELO
#283
0W 2L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
926
ELO
#1162
5W 20L · 20%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
920
ELO
#934
12W 22L · 35%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#1072
#1072
Season 1
870 pts
10W / 31L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#331
#331
Season 1
998 pts
5W / 5L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#622
#622
Season 1
963 pts
1W / 5L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
FFA · BFME1
BEST
#230
#230
Season 1
979 pts
0W / 7L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
DepressingAura
5W 1L, 83% over 6 games
Mateusz316
12W 24L
33%
Krecik
9W 20L
31%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Krecik & Mateusz316 & PanTomasz
8W 20L
29%
DepressingAura & Mateusz316 & PanTomasz
4W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
1010 & dadakosi5 & ZigMoose
1W 1L
50%
Abraham Lincoln & Duct-Tape Boy & NEGAN
0W 2L
0%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1Tributs of HarnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 920
  • Opponent rating: 1004.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 930
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:42·2026-10-23 18:44 UTC
WBFME1Brandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 926
  • Opponent rating: 1007.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 936
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:28:30·2026-10-06 19:10 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 956
  • Team average: 1057 against 982.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 961
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:58·2026-09-28 18:17 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 952
  • Team average: 1053 against 958.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 956
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:47·2026-09-28 18:04 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 961
  • Team average: 1062 against 995.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 967
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:44·2026-09-28 17:16 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 951
  • Team average: 1014 against 1057.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 961
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:54·2026-09-27 22:13 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Team average: 1003 against 1121.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 951
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:51·2026-09-27 21:52 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 930
  • Team average: 993 against 1076.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 940
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:04·2026-09-27 21:34 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Team average: 986 against 944.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 930
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:53·2026-09-27 21:09 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 929
  • Team average: 1051 against 1006.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 936
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:22·2026-09-23 17:42 UTC