← Home

Seeadler

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 411,480 / 20,000 XP
8,520 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1
Men
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#321
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
996
ELO
#357
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
991
ELO
#693
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
980
ELO
#1267
1W 4L · 20%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
958
ELO
#444
0W 6L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
951
ELO
#415
2W 30L · 6%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
923
ELO
#924
6W 24L · 20%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Arnor
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Tiger6
2W 2L
50%
Didar
1W 3L
25%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Qwerwwewqq & Salussa & Seeadler
0W 2L
0%
Cruzificador & RepublikaSrpksa & Seeadler
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Beto & CHMAAN & sardor 1997
0W 3L
0%
ArGeNtInO & DreddyMG & PvtCowboy & Tomi
0W 2L
0%
71 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 929
  • Team average: 956 against 1016.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 923
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:29:50·2026-10-22 21:43 UTC
LBFME1ForlindonHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 953
  • Free for all, rated against 1046. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 951
Isengard·FFA·00:13:58·2026-10-22 20:00 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 931
  • Team average: 929 against 1057.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 929
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:00·2026-10-22 19:43 UTC
LBFME1BelfalasHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 954
  • Free for all, rated against 1076. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 953
Isengard·FFA·00:38:48·2026-10-22 19:20 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 932
  • Team average: 963 against 1182.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 931
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:49·2026-10-22 18:59 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 933
  • Team average: 975 against 1260.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 932
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:38·2026-10-22 18:31 UTC
LBFME1FFA Wold 2.22How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 956
  • Free for all, rated against 1033. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 954
Isengard·FFA·00:28:22·2026-10-21 20:43 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 942
  • Team average: 996 against 1004.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 933
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:30:03·2026-10-19 22:07 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 944
  • Team average: 963 against 1096.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 942
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:39·2026-10-18 21:50 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 952
  • Team average: 995 against 1009.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 944
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:07:59·2026-10-18 21:39 UTC