← Home

The Reaper

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 410,580 / 20,000 XP
9,420 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Dwarves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Show all 7
Men
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#156
1W 0L · 100%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
988
ELO
#1070
18W 21L · 46%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#799
#799
Season 1
989 pts
5W / 7L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Tarranon
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Tarranon
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Tarranon & The Reaper
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Eliasrey & krabovoz
1W 0L
100%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Have 25 friends.
The Fellowship
Level 1 of 2
3.1% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKJungles of Far HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 995
  • Opponent rating: 1033.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 988
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:24·2026-07-18 20:17 UTC
WRotWKFenmarchHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 988
  • Opponent rating: 949.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 995
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:14:32·2026-07-17 17:13 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 990
  • Opponent rating: 1125.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 988
Men·1 versus 1·00:10:56·2026-07-03 14:25 UTC
WRotWKMering StreamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Opponent rating: 1035.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 990
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:15:56·2026-07-01 20:15 UTC
LRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 981
  • Opponent rating: 1146.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 980
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:59·2026-07-01 02:40 UTC
vs Kidd
WRotWKNorth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Opponent rating: 689.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 981
Elves·1 versus 1·00:20:10·2026-07-01 02:17 UTC
LRotWKGladden RiverHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 985
  • Opponent rating: 1058.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 980
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:08:27·2026-06-26 20:41 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 995
  • Opponent rating: 936.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 985
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:11:45·2026-06-26 20:27 UTC
vs Grio
WRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 986
  • Opponent rating: 980.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 995
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:22:00·2026-06-26 00:59 UTC
LRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 993
  • Opponent rating: 1028.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 986
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:19:13·2026-06-25 20:16 UTC