← Home

TheOdyssey

📍 Italy
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,400 / 2,000 XP
600 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#792
#792
Season 2
989 pts
0W / 2L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#81
#81
Season 2
1,057 pts
11W / 3L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Mudryk
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Elarion
4W 2L
67%
Monarch_01
4W 2L
67%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Elarion & Monarch_01 & TheOdyssey
4W 2L
67%
alyosh & GabGandalf & TheOdyssey
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Dude1 & Durin Stonehand & VeIen
1W 0L
100%
1010 & Dude1 & magri
1W 0L
100%
32 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1047
  • Team average: 997 against 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1057
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:23:212026-09-27 19:22 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1044
  • Team average: 1094 against 982.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1047
Gondor3 versus 3 NM00:18:392026-09-27 19:01 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 1049 against 1038.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1044
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:17:402026-09-25 20:19 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Team average: 1043 against 992.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1036
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:09:102026-09-25 20:02 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1026
  • Team average: 1039 against 938.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1030
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:13:202026-09-25 19:46 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 1049 against 977.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1026
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:14:342026-09-25 19:27 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1026
  • Team average: 1039 against 1079.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1036
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:14:302026-09-25 19:11 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1027
  • Team average: 1040 against 1202.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1026
Gondor3 versus 3 NM00:08:462026-09-25 18:58 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 981 against 990.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1027
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:20:062026-09-25 12:41 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1029
  • Team average: 1030 against 987.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1036
Gondor3 versus 3 NM00:11:302026-09-25 12:22 UTC