← Home

Tsikos91

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,160 / 2,000 XP
840 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#303
1W 1L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
995
ELO
#423
1W 3L · 25%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
981
ELO
#698
4W 7L · 36%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Arnor
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
WaRPonY
0W 3L
0%
Arnor
2W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Arnor & f0rnost & Tsikos91
1W 0L
100%
JamesClear & STUTTGART & Tsikos91
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
7777 & BardArcher & dadakosi5
1W 0L
100%
Clifdoe & QShaunM & SET777
1W 0L
100%
40 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1001 against 975.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1000
Rohan·2 versus 2·00:43:51·2026-10-03 17:40 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 997
  • Opponent rating: 1124.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 995
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:04:21·2026-10-03 17:32 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 986
  • Team average: 966 against 1045.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 981
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:44·2026-09-10 21:25 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Team average: 1047 against 1059.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 986
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:07:16·2026-08-29 16:34 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1004
  • Team average: 1058 against 1026.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:40·2026-08-29 16:15 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 995 against 1071.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1004
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:23·2026-08-29 15:51 UTC
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 988
  • Opponent rating: 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 997
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:21·2026-08-28 20:26 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1001 against 1003.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:43·2026-08-28 19:58 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1019
  • Team average: 935 against 1121.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1018
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:15·2026-08-28 13:34 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1013
  • Team average: 1037 against 985.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1019
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:43·2026-08-28 13:01 UTC