← Home

Username

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 24,330 / 5,000 XP
670 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Gondor
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Show all 7
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKEnnorath · 1 versus 1
975
ELO
#601
0W 4L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
920
ELO
#923
2W 13L · 13%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
784
ELO
#1789
0W 44L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Matys
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Mitrandirtr
1W 2L
33%
FabianOger
0W 3L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Mitrandirtr & Username
1W 2L
33%
FabianOger & Username
0W 3L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
KYS_GHOST & Sgt.Ryan
0W 2L
0%
GLoRf1nDeLL & NZT-
0W 2L
0%
28 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKSouth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 926
  • Team average: 954 against 1019.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 920
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:28·2026-10-26 14:10 UTC
LRotWKUpper LebenninHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 935
  • Team average: 1009 against 1010.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 926
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:57·2026-10-26 13:58 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 785
  • Opponent rating: 938.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 784
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:22:01·2026-10-26 12:12 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 786
  • Opponent rating: 937.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 785
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:29·2026-10-26 11:57 UTC
LRotWKStonewain ValleyHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Team average: 961 against 1030.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 935
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:44·2026-10-25 20:34 UTC
LRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Team average: 972 against 1024.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 940
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:10:53·2026-10-25 20:19 UTC
LRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 981 against 981.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 946
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:15:08·2026-10-25 20:01 UTC
WRotWKFirien ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Team average: 1004 against 1007.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 955
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:13:26·2026-10-25 19:45 UTC
LRotWKThe CrossroadsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 990 against 996.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 946
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:11:23·2026-10-25 19:30 UTC
LRotWKEred LithuiHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Team average: 988 against 1087.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 955
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:06:21·2026-10-25 18:58 UTC