← Home

Username

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 24,620 / 5,000 XP
380 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Angmar
RotWK
Elves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
918
ELO
#931
4W 17L · 19%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
778
ELO
#1793
0W 45L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Jay Petrik
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
rafook
0W 4L
0%
Mitrandirtr
1W 2L
33%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
rafook & Username
0W 4L
0%
Mitrandirtr & Username
1W 2L
33%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
KYS_GHOST & Sgt.Ryan
0W 4L
0%
Narek0808 & Vahram
2W 0L
100%
34 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Finish a single game lasting over 2 hours.
No Swift Victory
2.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKNumenor's DownfallHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 924
  • Team average: 934 against 997.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 918
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:35:21·2026-10-26 22:01 UTC
LRotWKBucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 930
  • Team average: 940 against 991.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 924
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:17:54·2026-10-26 21:41 UTC
LRotWKWoodmen TownHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 933
  • Team average: 943 against 1052.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 930
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:02·2026-10-26 21:30 UTC
LRotWKUpper AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 937
  • Team average: 947 against 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 933
Goblins·2 versus 2·00:09:49·2026-10-26 21:14 UTC
WRotWKStonewain ValleyHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 929
  • Team average: 973 against 949.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 937
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:47:14·2026-10-26 20:06 UTC
WRotWKUdunHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 920
  • Team average: 964 against 958.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 929
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:22:34·2026-10-26 19:38 UTC
LRotWKRhudaur HillsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 784
  • Opponent rating: 850.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 778
Men·1 versus 1·01:26:20·2026-10-26 17:40 UTC
vs Pies
LRotWKSouth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 926
  • Team average: 954 against 1019.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 920
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:28·2026-10-26 14:10 UTC
LRotWKUpper LebenninHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 935
  • Team average: 1009 against 1010.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 926
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:57·2026-10-26 13:58 UTC
LRotWKTharbadHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 785
  • Opponent rating: 938.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 784
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:22:01·2026-10-26 12:12 UTC