← Home

Zig2nation

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1840 / 2,000 XP
1,160 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
RotWKMAIN
Dwarves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#301
1W 0L · 100%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#904
#904
Season 1
983 pts
0W / 2L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Balinn
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Balinn
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Balinn & Zig2nation
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Paeris & rafook
1W 0L
100%

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Dwarves·1 versus 1·00:09:23·2026-02-10 13:37 UTC
LRotWKEmerald IsletHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:10:24·2026-02-10 13:25 UTC
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:12:40·2026-01-08 12:01 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:20:32·2026-01-03 21:10 UTC
WRotWKThe CrossroadsHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 993 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:16:44·2026-01-03 20:47 UTC
WRotWKWest ArthedainHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:21:39·2026-01-03 20:16 UTC
LRotWKIsle of BalarHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:14:32·2026-01-02 02:14 UTC
WRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:40·2026-01-02 01:49 UTC
WRotWKWest EmnetHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:16:38·2026-01-02 01:25 UTC
vs Fly-
WRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:42:31·2026-01-01 23:14 UTC