← Home

elfdogan

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 36,260 / 10,000 XP
3,740 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Men
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Elves
RotWK
Mordor
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK
Goblins
RotWK
Show all 7
Angmar
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
990
ELO
#672
1W 2L · 33%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
BEST
#1176
#1176
Season 1
944 pts
28W / 40L
2026-05-15

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TheKing
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
TheKing
1W 0L
100%
krabovoz
1W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
elfdogan & TheKing
1W 0L
100%
elfdogan & krabovoz
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
MrBoGiNnS & Velfia
1W 0L
100%
Mullrik & Simfe
1W 0L
100%
6 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:11:04·2026-03-06 21:35 UTC
LRotWKSouth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 998
  • Team average: 1012 against 1029.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 990
Dwarves·2 versus 2·00:25:23·2026-03-03 16:25 UTC
WRotWKRhudaur HillsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:30:34·2026-02-26 17:52 UTC
LRotWKSakura ForestHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:17:52·2026-02-26 17:30 UTC
LRotWKFords of BruinenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:43:47·2026-02-24 21:02 UTC
LRotWKFirien ForestHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 1016 against 1024.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 998
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:14:39·2026-02-24 20:30 UTC
LRotWKFords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:12:39·2026-02-24 20:00 UTC
WRotWKRuins of DunlandHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:03:53·2026-02-24 19:03 UTC
WRotWKPlains of LindonHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:22:40·2026-02-24 18:33 UTC
WRotWKFords of StockbrookHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Men·1 versus 1·00:15:47·2026-02-24 18:05 UTC