← HomeLEVEL
Level 413,140 / 20,000 XP
6,860 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1W 1L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
0W 1L · 0%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
#340
Season 1
1,000 pts
2W / 4L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
#767
Season 1
959 pts
3W / 9L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
#529
Season 1
982 pts
5W / 7L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
#66
Season 1
1,009 pts
1W / 0L
2026-08-01
#165
Season 1
994 pts
0W / 2L
2026-08-01
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
tom12
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
jda10 & SewyMoP0Ga
2W 4L
33%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Bergkamp & jokerrr
2W 0L
100%
jokerrr & SewyMoP0Ga
0W 2L
0%
66 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
LBFME1Far Harad 2.22How this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 994 against 1025.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 993
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:18:59·2026-10-09 17:58 UTC
LBFME1FFA MirkwoodHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1000
- Free for all, rated against 996. Each opponent counts on its own.
- An even match.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 997
Isengard·FFA·00:13:13·2026-10-09 17:37 UTC 
LBFME1FFA BucklandHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·FFA·00:42:53·2026-06-24 17:56 UTC 
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:23:55·2026-06-14 10:21 UTC 
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:55·2026-06-14 10:03 UTC 
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:03:52·2026-06-14 09:42 UTC 
LBFME1FFA MirkwoodHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·FFA·00:36:02·2026-06-06 19:14 UTC 
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:59·2026-06-06 18:57 UTC LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:24:31·2026-05-24 09:27 UTC LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:13:44·2026-05-24 09:03 UTC
