← HomeLEVEL
Level 413,140 / 20,000 XP
6,860 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Ladders
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1W 1L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
0W 1L · 0%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
#340
Season 1
1,000 pts
2W / 4L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
#767
Season 1
959 pts
3W / 9L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
#529
Season 1
982 pts
5W / 7L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
#66
Season 1
1,009 pts
1W / 0L
2026-08-01
#165
Season 1
994 pts
0W / 2L
2026-08-01
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
tom12
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
jda10 & SewyMoP0Ga
2W 4L
33%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Bergkamp & jokerrr
2W 0L
100%
jokerrr & SewyMoP0Ga
0W 2L
0%
66 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players
WBFME1Central Ithilien 2.22How this was worked out- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 1042 against 1024.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1001
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:14:08·2026-10-09 18:21 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:02·2026-06-06 18:30 UTC 
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:22:07·2026-06-06 18:05 UTC 
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:07:08·2026-05-24 09:18 UTC WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:04:33·2026-05-23 13:14 UTC 
WBFME1Fangorn IIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:54:11·2026-05-23 12:58 UTC 
WBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:26·2026-05-16 19:22 UTC 
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:36·2026-05-11 18:39 UTC WBFME1Fangorn IIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:09:23·2026-05-08 18:05 UTC 
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:24:45·2026-05-08 17:35 UTC
