← Home

jonko2002

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,230 / 5,000 XP
2,770 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1
Goblins
RotWK

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
998
ELO
#395
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
995
ELO
#582
0W 1L · 0%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#210
#210
Season 1
1,009 pts
1W / 0L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#152
#152
Season 1
1,012 pts
2W / 1L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#164
#164
Season 1
993 pts
0W / 1L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Legolas22
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
evil75
1W 2L
33%
Amarth
1W 1L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
BORA_BORA & jonko2002 & Legolas22
1W 0L
100%
Indywind & jonko2002 & Orack
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Amarth & Frodo
1W 1L
50%
M_D_M. & Newera9500 & wanderking
1W 0L
100%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1008
  • Team average: 1119 against 1058.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 998
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:00·2026-09-19 18:17 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 957 against 931.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1008
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:27·2026-09-13 18:12 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:26:30·2026-07-18 20:02 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:09:53·2026-07-18 18:37 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:18:21·2026-07-16 01:07 UTC
WBFME1LebenninHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·3 versus 3·00:26:01·2026-07-15 22:18 UTC
LRotWKNear HaradHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1087.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 995
Goblins·1 versus 1·00:09:51·2026-07-15 00:52 UTC
WBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:17:34·2026-07-15 00:13 UTC
LBFME1Central Ithilien 2.22How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:12:00·2024-10-21 03:19 UTC
WBFME1Pelargir 2.22How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:20:34·2024-10-20 23:06 UTC