← Home

Newera9500

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1600 / 2,000 XP
1,400 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
RotWK
Arnor
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKEnnorath · 1 versus 1
995
ELO
#254
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 1 versus 1
991
ELO
#890
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
991
ELO
#278
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
990
ELO
#553
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
985
ELO
#800
0W 2L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
972
ELO
#769
0W 4L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Lord Ziggy
0W 1L, 0% over 1 games
Lord Ziggy
0W 1L
0%
dadakosi5
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
dadakosi5 & Lord Ziggy & Newera9500
0W 1L
0%
Aimer32 & Bobur8855 & Newera9500
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Aimer32 & B00TYJudy & OGHutch
0W 1L
0%
Balrog2.0 & kokand77 & Nubasa
0W 1L
0%
18 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 982
  • Team average: 1036 against 972.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 972
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:57·2026-10-02 14:37 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Opponent rating: 1047.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 985
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:16:04·2026-09-25 16:06 UTC
LRotWKGreenhamHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 976.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Mordor·1 versus 1·00:15:51·2026-09-23 15:45 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 999 against 993.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 982
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:22·2026-09-18 10:18 UTC
LRotWKWestfold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 1071.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 995
Arnor·1 versus 1·00:09:04·2026-09-15 16:37 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Team average: 931 against 957.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 991
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:27·2026-09-13 18:12 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1018 against 1165.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 999
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:42·2026-09-06 16:12 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Rohan·4 versus 4·00:09:39·2026-09-04 16:10 UTC
LBFME1Far Harad 2.22How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1024 against 988.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 990
Rohan·2 versus 2·00:18:32·2026-09-04 15:46 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 990.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·1 versus 1·00:04:17·2026-09-04 14:03 UTC