← Home

Nubasa

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1720 / 2,000 XP
1,280 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
991
ELO
#302
1W 2L · 33%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
991
ELO
#622
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
985
ELO
#654
2W 4L · 33%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Rohanero
2W 1L, 67% over 3 games
kokand77
1W 3L
25%
Rohanero
2W 1L
67%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Bobur8855 & kokand77 & Nubasa
0W 2L
0%
Balrog2.0 & kokand77 & Nubasa
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
4546 & GERCULES & legolast .. & LITTO
1W 1L
50%
Aimer32 & Bobur8855 & Newera9500
1W 0L
100%
22 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Team average: 985 against 971.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 985
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:54·2026-09-22 14:43 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4·00:12:06·2026-09-18 11:54 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Team average: 986 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:25·2026-09-18 11:34 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1008
  • Team average: 991 against 1072.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1003
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:14·2026-09-18 10:35 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Team average: 993 against 999.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1008
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:22·2026-09-18 10:18 UTC
WBFME1Lamedon II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:15:03·2026-09-04 19:14 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin IIHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4·00:13:51·2026-09-04 18:57 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 997
  • Team average: 1078 against 951.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 999
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:50·2026-09-04 18:39 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 959 against 1081.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 997
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:35·2026-09-04 18:20 UTC
LBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Opponent rating: 978.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Gondor·1 versus 1·00:14:26·2026-09-01 17:41 UTC