← Home

oybek

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 528,170 / 40,000 XP
11,830 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1034
ELO
#111
63W 84L · 43%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1022
ELO
#136
6W 3L · 67%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
1001
ELO
#346
13W 17L · 43%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
962
ELO
#382
1W 23L · 4%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
952
ELO
#429
2W 11L · 15%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NeYo
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Alisher008
17W 20L
46%
jovmard
14W 20L
41%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Alisher008 & jovmard & oybek
9W 12L
43%
islamhan & oybek
5W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
greyhound & M_D_M. & wanderking
4W 0L
100%
Beto & CHMAAN & sardor 1997
1W 2L
33%
65 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1041
  • Team average: 1013 against 1047.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1034
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:30·2026-10-23 19:45 UTC
LBFME1Enedwaith II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 953
  • Team average: 988 against 1157.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 952
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:11:51·2026-10-23 19:30 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1032
  • Team average: 1002 against 1007.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1041
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:25·2026-10-23 19:05 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Team average: 1244 against 944.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1032
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:09·2026-10-23 12:45 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1032
  • Team average: 982 against 1288.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1031
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:09·2026-10-23 12:30 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1033
  • Team average: 1000 against 1287.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1032
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:07·2026-10-23 12:15 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1023
  • Team average: 1027 against 1089.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1033
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:48·2026-10-21 17:17 UTC
LBFME1Fields of Edhellond NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 959
  • Team average: 985 against 1039.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 953
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:16:27·2026-10-21 16:59 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1026
  • Team average: 1030 against 1146.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 1023
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:01:35·2026-10-21 16:52 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 983 against 954.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1026
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:29·2026-10-20 19:58 UTC