← Home

oybek

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 528,170 / 40,000 XP
11,830 XP to level 6
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1034
ELO
#112
63W 84L · 43%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1022
ELO
#136
6W 3L · 67%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
1001
ELO
#348
13W 17L · 43%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
962
ELO
#382
1W 23L · 4%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
952
ELO
#431
2W 11L · 15%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
NeYo
4W 0L, 100% over 4 games
Alisher008
17W 20L
46%
jovmard
14W 20L
41%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Alisher008 & jovmard & oybek
9W 12L
43%
islamhan & oybek
5W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
greyhound & M_D_M. & wanderking
4W 0L
100%
Beto & CHMAAN & sardor 1997
1W 2L
33%
65 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1032
  • Team average: 1002 against 1007.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1041
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:25·2026-10-23 19:05 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Team average: 1244 against 944.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1032
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:09·2026-10-23 12:45 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1023
  • Team average: 1027 against 1089.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1033
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:48·2026-10-21 17:17 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1049
  • Team average: 976 against 864.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1052
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:36·2026-10-17 18:15 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1042
  • Team average: 942 against 912.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1049
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:52·2026-10-17 17:48 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1040
  • Team average: 1048 against 1159.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 1051
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:16·2026-10-16 18:28 UTC
WBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1029
  • Team average: 1069 against 1183.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 1040
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:27:54·2026-10-16 17:47 UTC
WBFME1The Shire NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1026
  • Team average: 944 against 926.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1034
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:45·2026-10-16 16:58 UTC
WBFME1Fords of IsenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Opponent rating: 991.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1001
Rohan·1 versus 1·00:38:52·2026-10-15 20:08 UTC
WBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1025
  • Team average: 1012 against 953.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1031
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:30·2026-10-15 19:41 UTC