← HomeLEVEL
Level 654,290 / 80,000 XP
25,710 XP to level 7
FACTION LEVELS
Show all 9
Ladders
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
30W 18L · 62%
BFME2Patch 1.06v4 · 1 versus 1
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · FFA
1W 1L · 50%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
3W 6L · 33%
LAST 5 SEASONS
Patch 2.02
1 versus 1 · RotWK
#79
Season 1
1,078 pts
83W / 69L
2026-05-15
Teams
Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Xewix
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Hunter... & piterpayn
6W 2L
75%
FatmanFred & piterpayn
3W 2L
60%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
BananenBro & VolkorBro
5W 2L
71%
Sebubu & Wrogashz
3W 1L
75%
61 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSWith and against
This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with.
SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONSAchievements
Loremaster
only 116 players
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.6% of players
Many Tongues
Level 1 of 2
only 152 players
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.4% of players
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players

WRotWKSorrow IslesHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:04:222026-03-02 20:56 UTC
LRotWKEastfoldHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard1 versus 100:22:042026-03-02 20:33 UTC
WRotWKShallows of IsenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Elves1 versus 100:21:382026-03-02 20:07 UTC
WRotWKOst-in-EdhilHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1067
- Team average: 1031 against 1035.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1076
Angmar2 versus 200:19:012026-02-28 21:57 UTC
WRotWKRiver HarnenHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:16:522026-02-26 21:48 UTC
LRotWKBrandy HillsHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Angmar1 versus 100:09:162026-02-26 16:37 UTC
WRotWKPinnath GelinHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1058
- Team average: 1038 against 1042.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1067
Mordor2 versus 200:16:532026-02-23 00:00 UTC
LRotWKSouthfarthingHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1066
- Team average: 1007 against 1034.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1058
Goblins2 versus 200:31:112026-02-22 22:42 UTC
WRotWKAnfalas ShoresHow this was worked out- Rating before: 1058
- Team average: 1027 against 1013.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1066
Angmar2 versus 200:13:572026-02-22 22:23 UTC
WRotWKErech IIIHow this was worked out- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Mordor1 versus 100:39:262026-02-21 19:36 UTC