← Home

sardor1997

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 1820 / 2,000 XP
1,180 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1025
ELO
#58
8W 1L · 89%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
990
ELO
#243
0W 1L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Beto
6W 0L, 100% over 6 games
Beto
6W 0L
100%
chaman11
6W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Beto & chaman11 & sardor1997
6W 0L
100%
botirov7xw & LordACE & sardor1997
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Bastir & Herusul & jonnyy
1W 0L
100%
Bastir & botirov7xw & LordACE
1W 0L
100%
17 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1015
  • Team average: 979 against 1016.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1025
 Solo queue
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:19:262026-11-15 13:31 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1021 against 971.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1015
 Solo queue
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:21:022026-11-15 13:08 UTC
LBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 970.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 990
 Solo queue
Rohan2 versus 200:18:132026-11-15 12:41 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1002 against 1002.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1009
 Solo queue
Gondor3 versus 3 NM00:11:262026-11-15 12:26 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1016
  • Team average: 1088 against 957.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1018
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:10:462026-11-15 11:50 UTC
WBFME1Harondor NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1014
  • Team average: 1086 against 945.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1016
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:20:302026-11-15 11:24 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1010
  • Team average: 1082 against 983.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1014
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:13:552026-11-15 11:03 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1006
  • Team average: 1073 against 974.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1010
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:14:202026-11-08 11:18 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Team average: 1070 against 952.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1006
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:01:552026-11-08 11:15 UTC
WBFME1Harondor NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1067 against 956.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1003
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:14:292026-11-08 10:57 UTC