← Home

sardor1997

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,100 / 2,000 XP
900 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1026
ELO
#58
9W 4L · 69%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
990
ELO
#252
0W 1L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Beto
6W 0L, 100% over 6 games
Beto
6W 0L
100%
chaman11
6W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Beto & chaman11 & sardor1997
6W 0L
100%
Biedzia & Pasha & sardor1997
0W 2L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
JAN97Sy & Pablo.420 & Squishy
0W 2L
0%
Bastir & PvtCowboy & wanderking
1W 0L
100%
27 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.
LBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1028
  • Team average: 971 against 1110.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1026
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:19:392026-11-15 14:45 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Team average: 973 against 1108.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1028
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:03:062026-11-15 14:40 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Team average: 988 against 1166.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1030
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:15:462026-11-15 14:19 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1025
  • Team average: 1017 against 962.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1031
 Solo queue
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:24:142026-11-15 13:53 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1015
  • Team average: 979 against 1016.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1025
 Solo queue
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:19:262026-11-15 13:31 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1021 against 971.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1015
 Solo queue
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:21:022026-11-15 13:08 UTC
LBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 970.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 990
 Solo queue
Rohan2 versus 200:18:132026-11-15 12:41 UTC
LBFME1Gorgoroth NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1002 against 1002.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1009
 Solo queue
Gondor3 versus 3 NM00:11:262026-11-15 12:26 UTC
WBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1016
  • Team average: 1088 against 957.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1018
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:10:462026-11-15 11:50 UTC
WBFME1Harondor NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1014
  • Team average: 1086 against 945.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1016
 Party game
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:20:302026-11-15 11:24 UTC