Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1234
- Team average: 1222 against 1071.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1235
38th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1123
- Team average: 1222 against 1071.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1124
7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1311
- Team average: 1222 against 1071.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1312
vs
Losers
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1233
- Team average: 1071 against 1222.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1232
812th ➔ 816th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 953
- Team average: 1071 against 1222.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 952
126th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 1071 against 1222.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1028
Winners
26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1170
- Team average: 1036 against 939.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1174
134th ➔ 126th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1025
- Team average: 1036 against 939.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1029
888th ➔ 885th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 913
- Team average: 1036 against 939.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 917
vs
Losers
717th ➔ 744th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 939 against 1036.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 972
834th ➔ 841st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 947
- Team average: 939 against 1036.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 943
900th ➔ 902nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 896
- Team average: 939 against 1036.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 892
Winners
31st ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1146
- Team average: 1068 against 1074.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1155
105th ➔ 88th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1037
- Team average: 1068 against 1074.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1046
140th ➔ 118th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1023
- Team average: 1068 against 1074.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1032
vs
Losers
798th ➔ 812th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 962
- Team average: 1074 against 1068.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 953
6th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1320
- Team average: 1074 against 1068.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1311
848th ➔ 862nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 940
- Team average: 1074 against 1068.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 931
Winners
220th ➔ 173rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1058 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1016
25th ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1174
- Team average: 1058 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1181
501st ➔ 376th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1058 against 1013.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 999
vs
Losers
191st ➔ 258th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1013
- Team average: 1013 against 1058.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1006
190th ➔ 257th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1013
- Team average: 1013 against 1058.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1006
186th ➔ 256th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1013
- Team average: 1013 against 1058.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1006
Winners
vs
Losers
62nd ➔ 66th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1082
- Opponent rating: 974.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -11.
- Rating after: 1071
Winners
721st ➔ 686th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 976
- Team average: 998 against 919.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 981
919th ➔ 917th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 844
- Team average: 998 against 919.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 849
25th ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1174
- Team average: 998 against 919.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1179
vs
Losers
915th ➔ 916th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 854
- Team average: 919 against 998.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 849
806th ➔ 811th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 959
- Team average: 919 against 998.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 954
838th ➔ 848th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 945
- Team average: 919 against 998.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 940
Winners
843rd ➔ 842nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 942
- Team average: 1052 against 914.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 944
20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1192
- Team average: 1052 against 914.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1194
139th ➔ 134th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1023
- Team average: 1052 against 914.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1025
vs
Losers
915th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 856
- Team average: 914 against 1052.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 854
834th ➔ 838th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 947
- Team average: 914 against 1052.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 945
849th ➔ 850th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 940
- Team average: 914 against 1052.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 938
Winners
161st ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1017
- Team average: 1048 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1023
36th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1128
- Team average: 1048 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1134
342nd ➔ 267th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1048 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +6.
- Rating after: 1006
vs
Losers
827th ➔ 843rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 948
- Team average: 986 against 1048.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 942
197th ➔ 259th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 986 against 1048.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 1006
unranked ➔ 471st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 986 against 1048.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -6.
- Rating after: 994
Winners
108th ➔ 89th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1035
- Team average: 1027 against 1089.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1045
132nd ➔ 111th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1027 against 1089.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1034
138th ➔ 116th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1023
- Team average: 1027 against 1089.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Win: +10.
- Rating after: 1033
vs
Losers
30th ➔ 31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1156
- Team average: 1089 against 1027.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1146
28th ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1163
- Team average: 1089 against 1027.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 1153
822nd ➔ 848th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 950
- Team average: 1089 against 1027.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Loss: -10.
- Rating after: 940
Winners
511th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1170 against 915.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 992
71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Team average: 1170 against 915.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1062
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1459
- Team average: 1170 against 915.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1460
vs
Losers
826th ➔ 828th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 915 against 1170.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 948
812th ➔ 816th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 953
- Team average: 915 against 1170.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 952
918th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 845
- Team average: 915 against 1170.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 844
Winners
31st ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1153
- Team average: 1146 against 1030.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1156
28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1160
- Team average: 1146 against 1030.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1163
37th ➔ 36th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1125
- Team average: 1146 against 1030.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1128
vs
Losers
103rd ➔ 108th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1038
- Team average: 1030 against 1146.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1035
125th ➔ 132nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1027
- Team average: 1030 against 1146.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1024
127th ➔ 138th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1026
- Team average: 1030 against 1146.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1023
Winners
816th ➔ 798th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 953
- Team average: 1060 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 962
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1238
- Team average: 1060 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1247
553rd ➔ 342nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1060 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1000
vs
Losers
27th ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1169
- Team average: 1059 against 1060.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1160
146th ➔ 183rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1022
- Team average: 1059 against 1060.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1013
621st ➔ 702nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Team average: 1059 against 1060.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 977
Winners
6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1317
- Team average: 1104 against 981.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1320
283rd ➔ 248th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1005
- Team average: 1104 against 981.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1008
509th ➔ 469th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1104 against 981.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 994
vs
Losers
109th ➔ 111th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1036
- Team average: 981 against 1104.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1033
817th ➔ 826th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 952
- Team average: 981 against 1104.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 949
807th ➔ 811th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 956
- Team average: 981 against 1104.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 953
Winners
119th ➔ 118th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1030
- Team average: 1080 against 898.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1031
99th ➔ 96th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1039
- Team average: 1080 against 898.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1040
25th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1173
- Team average: 1080 against 898.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1174
vs
Losers
917th ➔ 918th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 846
- Team average: 898 against 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 845
922nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 761
- Team average: 898 against 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 760
57th ➔ 58th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Team average: 898 against 1080.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1088
Winners
621st ➔ 553rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Team average: 1055 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 991
13th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1233
- Team average: 1055 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 1238
832nd ➔ 816th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 948
- Team average: 1055 against 986.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +5.
- Rating after: 953
vs
Losers
802nd ➔ 807th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 961
- Team average: 986 against 1055.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 956
807th ➔ 817th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 957
- Team average: 986 against 1055.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 952
95th ➔ 109th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1041
- Team average: 986 against 1055.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -5.
- Rating after: 1036
Winners
6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1316
- Team average: 1170 against 930.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1317
289th ➔ 283rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1004
- Team average: 1170 against 930.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1005
20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1191
- Team average: 1170 against 930.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1192
vs
Losers
922nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 762
- Team average: 930 against 1170.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 761
173rd ➔ 174th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1016
- Team average: 930 against 1170.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1015
193rd ➔ 198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 930 against 1170.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1011
Winners
152nd ➔ 146th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1019
- Team average: 1111 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1022
28th ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1166
- Team average: 1111 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1169
31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1150
- Team average: 1111 against 997.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1153
vs
Losers
580th ➔ 620th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 989
- Team average: 997 against 1111.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 986
248th ➔ 266th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 997 against 1111.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1005
469th ➔ 509th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 997 against 1111.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 991
Winners
111th ➔ 95th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 995 against 971.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1041
908th ➔ 904th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 880
- Team average: 995 against 971.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 888
63rd ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Team average: 995 against 971.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1082
vs
Losers
469th ➔ 621st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 994
- Team average: 971 against 995.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 986
629th ➔ 703rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 985
- Team average: 971 against 995.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 977
855th ➔ 871st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 935
- Team average: 971 against 995.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 927
Winners
6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1315
- Team average: 1169 against 988.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1316
297th ➔ 289th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1003
- Team average: 1169 against 988.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1004
20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1190
- Team average: 1169 against 988.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1191
vs
Losers
807th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 958
- Team average: 988 against 1169.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 957
828th ➔ 833rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 948
- Team average: 988 against 1169.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 947
72nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1058
- Team average: 988 against 1169.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1057
Winners
31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1149
- Team average: 1124 against 962.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1150
13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1232
- Team average: 1124 against 962.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1233
470th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 993
- Team average: 1124 against 962.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 994
vs
Losers
148th ➔ 152nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Team average: 962 against 1124.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1019
916th ➔ 917th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 847
- Team average: 962 against 1124.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 846
153rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1020
- Team average: 962 against 1124.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1019
Winners
28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1165
- Team average: 1227 against 921.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1166
71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1060
- Team average: 1227 against 921.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1061
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1458
- Team average: 1227 against 921.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1459
vs
Losers
922nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 763
- Team average: 921 against 1227.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 762
581st ➔ 597th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 989
- Team average: 921 against 1227.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 988
193rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1013
- Team average: 921 against 1227.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1012
Winners
32nd ➔ 31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1141
- Team average: 1051 against 1032.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1149
unranked ➔ 248th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1051 against 1032.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1008
198th ➔ 153rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1012
- Team average: 1051 against 1032.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1020
vs
Losers
10th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1240
- Team average: 1032 against 1051.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1232
914th ➔ 916th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 855
- Team average: 1032 against 1051.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 847
320th ➔ 470th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 1032 against 1051.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 993
Winners
921st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 760
- Team average: 1090 against 978.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 763
73rd ➔ 71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1057
- Team average: 1090 against 978.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1060
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1455
- Team average: 1090 against 978.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +3.
- Rating after: 1458
vs
Losers
71st ➔ 72nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Team average: 978 against 1090.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 1058
510th ➔ 580th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 978 against 1090.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 989
907th ➔ 909th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 882
- Team average: 978 against 1090.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -3.
- Rating after: 879
Winners
6th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1314
- Team average: 1168 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1315
20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1189
- Team average: 1168 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1190
296th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 1168 against 970.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1003
vs
Losers
554th ➔ 581st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 970 against 1168.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 989
628th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 986
- Team average: 970 against 1168.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 985
854th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 936
- Team average: 970 against 1168.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 935
Winners
vs
Losers
778th ➔ 781st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 965
- Opponent rating: 1176.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 964
Winners
554th ➔ 510th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 1073 against 940.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 992
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1238
- Team average: 1073 against 940.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 1240
492nd ➔ 469th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 1073 against 940.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +2.
- Rating after: 994
vs
Losers
71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1063
- Team average: 940 against 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 1061
921st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 762
- Team average: 940 against 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 760
431st ➔ 470th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 940 against 1073.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -2.
- Rating after: 993
Winners
825th ➔ 806th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 951 against 958.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 958
702nd ➔ 628th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 977
- Team average: 951 against 958.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 986
870th ➔ 854th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 927
- Team average: 951 against 958.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 936
vs
Losers
806th ➔ 827th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 957
- Team average: 958 against 951.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 948
123rd ➔ 148th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1029
- Team average: 958 against 951.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1020
903rd ➔ 908th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 889
- Team average: 958 against 951.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 880
Winners
20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1188
- Team average: 1145 against 960.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1189
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1237
- Team average: 1145 against 960.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1238
198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1011
- Team average: 1145 against 960.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +1.
- Rating after: 1012
vs
Losers
921st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 763
- Team average: 960 against 1145.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 762
724th ➔ 729th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 975
- Team average: 960 against 1145.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 974
31st ➔ 32nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1142
- Team average: 960 against 1145.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -1.
- Rating after: 1141
Winners
581st ➔ 430th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 989
- Team average: 1022 against 973.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 996
73rd ➔ 71st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1056
- Team average: 1022 against 973.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1063
140th ➔ 123rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1022
- Team average: 1022 against 973.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1029
vs
Losers
645th ➔ 702nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 984
- Team average: 973 against 1022.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 977
857th ➔ 870th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 934
- Team average: 973 against 1022.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 927
298th ➔ 431st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1002
- Team average: 973 against 1022.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 995
Winners
754th ➔ 721st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 969
- Team average: 1027 against 979.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 976
908th ➔ 903rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 882
- Team average: 1027 against 979.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 889
14th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1230
- Team average: 1027 against 979.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1237
vs
Losers
921st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 770
- Team average: 979 against 1027.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 763
31st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1149
- Team average: 979 against 1027.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1142
161st ➔ 198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1018
- Team average: 979 against 1027.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1011