← Home

Elyor0707The Ring Is DestroyedTwo Ages of the World

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 411,230 / 20,000 XP
8,770 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#633
#633
Season 1
991 pts
1W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#544
#544
Season 1
991 pts
18W / 20L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#297
#456
Season 2
995 pts
5W / 6L
2026-11-01
#297
Season 1
999 pts
23W / 26L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#89
#89
Season 2
1,009 pts
1W / 0L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
SewyMoP0Ga
3W 0L, 100% over 3 games
Mico
4W 11L
27%
Azizbek
3W 8L
27%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Azizbek & Elyor0707
1W 4L
20%
Aragornn & Elyor0707
0W 4L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Mico & SewyMoP0Ga
2W 2L
50%
Mico & SubMax
2W 0L
100%
67 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in each of 2 seasons. The Turning of the Year · 7 Aug 2026 Two Ages of the World · 1 Nov 2026
Two Ages of the World
Level 2 of 2
1.6% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players
Complete the entire good campaign.
The Ring Is Destroyed
1.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Team average: 959 against 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 995
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:18·2026-10-08 16:48 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1006
  • Team average: 915 against 962.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 999
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:34·2026-10-08 16:18 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 1036 against 1196.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1006
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:47·2026-10-08 15:59 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1016
  • Team average: 993 against 987.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:31·2026-09-22 16:55 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1013
  • Team average: 1078 against 963.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1016
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:27·2026-09-09 13:09 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1007
  • Team average: 1037 against 980.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 1013
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:17·2026-08-21 18:27 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 997
  • Team average: 984 against 1039.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 1007
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:09·2026-08-10 16:59 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 981 against 930.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +6.
  • Rating after: 997
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:41·2026-08-10 16:24 UTC
WBFME1Lamedon II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
Isengard·4 versus 4 NM·00:11:03·2026-08-01 17:47 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 982
  • Team average: 997 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:17·2026-08-01 17:23 UTC