← Home

M010365

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 23,820 / 5,000 XP
1,180 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
998
ELO
#134
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
982
ELO
#868
1W 4L · 20%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
978
ELO
#392
0W 3L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
927
ELO
#870
6W 19L · 24%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
914
ELO
#912
4W 21L · 16%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Goos33
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
mashhurbek
0W 3L
0%
Goos33
2W 0L
100%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
M010365 & SewyMoP0Ga
0W 2L
0%
Free-Willy & M010365
0W 2L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Glaurungg & KingZiggy & P0wys
0W 2L
0%
BBS3735 & BoNYa & ZerO0918
1W 0L
100%
57 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 931
  • Team average: 960 against 1064.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 927
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:09:37·2026-10-15 17:39 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 915
  • Team average: 903 against 1284.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 914
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:52·2026-10-15 16:34 UTC
LBFME1Harondor NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 918
  • Team average: 972 against 1088.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 915
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:52·2026-10-13 18:31 UTC
WBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 913
  • Team average: 1035 against 959.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +5.
  • Rating after: 918
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:02:29·2026-10-13 17:37 UTC
LBFME1HarlondHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 938
  • Team average: 969 against 1005.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 931
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:09:03·2026-10-13 17:27 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 917
  • Team average: 959 against 1048.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 913
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:18·2026-10-08 16:48 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 919
  • Team average: 955 against 1093.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 917
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:52·2026-10-08 16:35 UTC
LBFME1AnorienHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 945
  • Team average: 950 against 999.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 938
Gondor·2 versus 2·00:20:46·2026-10-08 16:08 UTC
LBFME1Wold IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 951
  • Team average: 954 against 1015.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 945
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:08:43·2026-10-08 15:57 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 920
  • Team average: 969 against 1195.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 919
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:13·2026-10-07 19:03 UTC