← Home

Ideal army

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 35,800 / 10,000 XP
4,200 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Rohan
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1037
ELO
#114
19W 7L · 73%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1009
ELO
#199
2W 1L · 67%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
996
ELO
#422
6W 6L · 50%

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#224
#224
Season 1
1,011 pts
10W / 8L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#306
#306
Season 1
1,000 pts
2W / 2L
2026-08-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#608
#608
Season 1
967 pts
2W / 7L
2026-08-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
CHMAAN
10W 1L, 91% over 11 games
Beto
11W 2L
85%
CHMAAN
10W 1L
91%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Beto & CHMAAN & Ideal army
10W 1L
91%
gendicha & Ideal army & SyrianFury
1W 1L
50%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
FaxBFME1 & Honzik & Rohannn.
1W 0L
100%
FaxBFME1 & Rohannn. & Snakeshiet
1W 0L
100%
58 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1035
  • Team average: 1129 against 996.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1037
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:56·2026-10-01 13:25 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Team average: 1128 against 978.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1035
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:40·2026-10-01 13:10 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1033
  • Team average: 1127 against 915.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1034
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:46·2026-10-01 12:43 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1031
  • Team average: 1125 against 984.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1033
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:47·2026-10-01 12:13 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Team average: 1124 against 925.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 1031
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:47·2026-10-01 12:01 UTC
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1026
  • Team average: 1120 against 1020.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +4.
  • Rating after: 1030
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:58·2026-10-01 11:33 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 1104 against 1034.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1026
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:50·2026-10-01 11:01 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1034
  • Team average: 1105 against 980.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1036
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:36·2026-09-27 11:37 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1032
  • Team average: 1103 against 965.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +2.
  • Rating after: 1034
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:16·2026-09-27 11:15 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1041
  • Team average: 1112 against 1115.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1032
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:35·2026-09-27 10:56 UTC