← Home

MELKORRR

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 22,140 / 5,000 XP
2,860 XP to level 3
FACTION LEVELS
Gondor
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Isengard
BFME1
Dwarves
RotWK
Isengard
RotWK

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
995
ELO
#244
0W 2L · 0%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 4 versus 4
991
ELO
#134
0W 1L · 0%
RotWKEdain · 3v3
990
ELO
0W 1L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
986
ELO
#616
0W 2L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
984
ELO
#346
1W 4L · 20%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
921
ELO
#899
3W 19L · 14%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
ZigMoose
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
Theodred10
0W 10L
0%
YoureKilingme
1W 1L
50%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
MELKORRR & OdinX & ZigMoose
1W 0L
100%
Lackin48 & MELKORRR & Rohanero & YoureKilingme
1W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Frodo & Jackasss & Theodred10
0W 2L
0%
LakatosCirmi & Lord Ziggy & tom12
1W 0L
100%
54 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Complete the entire good campaign.
The Ring Is Destroyed
1.1% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 985
  • Team average: 996 against 1155.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 984
Rohan·4 versus 4 NM·00:12:02·2026-10-23 18:33 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Team average: 968 against 1095.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 921
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:33·2026-10-17 22:42 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 914
  • Team average: 1024 against 1042.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 923
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:31:19·2026-10-17 19:36 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Team average: 969 against 970.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 914
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:21·2026-10-16 20:42 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 924
  • Team average: 969 against 1175.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 923
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:01·2026-10-15 18:52 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 928
  • Team average: 976 against 1075.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 924
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:17·2026-10-13 21:40 UTC
LRotWKPelennor Fields OutskirtsHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Isengard·4 versus 4·00:06:52·2026-10-10 20:48 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 933
  • Team average: 1034 against 1117.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 928
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:56·2026-10-10 20:19 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Gondor·4 versus 4 NM·00:14:27·2026-10-10 19:55 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 937
  • Team average: 922 against 1025.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 933
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:57·2026-10-10 13:52 UTC