← Home

Odrian

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 35,700 / 10,000 XP
4,300 XP to level 4
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
1 versus 1 · BFME1
BEST
#1111
#1111
Season 2
951 pts
3W / 9L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#942
#942
Season 2
890 pts
5W / 24L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#925
#925
Season 2
926 pts
14W / 27L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
TheDreamer
2W 0L, 100% over 2 games
Aranruth
1W 4L
20%
Arnor
3W 1L
75%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Arnor & f0rnost & Odrian
3W 1L
75%
fakamaka & Odrian & radju9698
2W 0L
100%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
ElDictador & Escu & Laetus77
2W 0L
100%
Arnor & f0rnost & radju9698
0W 2L
0%
63 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.6% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1Udun IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 896
  • Team average: 938 against 1001.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 890
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:17:06·2026-10-11 08:09 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 928
  • Team average: 1006 against 1137.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 926
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:39·2026-10-10 20:07 UTC
LBFME1Far Harad 2.22How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 901
  • Team average: 957 against 1032.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 896
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:05:39·2026-10-10 19:56 UTC
WBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 918
  • Team average: 976 against 1020.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +10.
  • Rating after: 928
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:38:48·2026-10-10 17:41 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 923
  • Team average: 905 against 987.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 918
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:30:30·2026-10-09 12:47 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 930
  • Team average: 1025 against 1068.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 923
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:49·2026-10-09 10:50 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 940
  • Team average: 1048 against 1009.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 930
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:21:06·2026-10-09 10:24 UTC
LBFME1MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 904
  • Team average: 945 against 1052.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 901
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:07:46·2026-10-09 10:10 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 948
  • Team average: 977 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 940
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:50·2026-10-08 15:54 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 947
  • Team average: 1192 against 1013.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +1.
  • Rating after: 948
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:27·2026-10-08 15:27 UTC