← Home

PaNdAMuSiC

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,080 / 2,000 XP
920 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
2 versus 2 · BFME1
BEST
#779
#779
Season 2
973 pts
0W / 3L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#731
#731
Season 2
980 pts
3W / 10L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
abod
1W 0L, 100% over 1 games
RaviuS
2W 11L
15%
Salussa
0W 2L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
PaNdAMuSiC & RaviuS & Salussa
0W 2L
0%
PaNdAMuSiC & RaviuS & Tarida
0W 2L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
Hydrox & MAGAA & Morgoth Bauglir
0W 2L
0%
JAN97Sy & MAGAA & The Khaleed
1W 0L
100%
38 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLostAny queueSolo queueParty games
WBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 969
  • Team average: 999 against 1107.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +11.
  • Rating after: 980
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:26:21·2026-10-01 19:50 UTC
LBFME1Emyn ArnenHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 981
  • Team average: 949 against 978.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 973
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:11:20·2026-10-01 19:37 UTC
WBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 962
  • Team average: 1044 against 1010.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 969
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:19·2026-10-01 14:28 UTC
LBFME1Fangorn IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 992 against 949.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 981
Mordor·2 versus 2·00:39:14·2026-09-30 22:45 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Team average: 975 against 1071.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 962
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:00·2026-09-30 22:09 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Team average: 947 against 1027.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 966
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:48·2026-09-30 21:39 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Team average: 990 against 1173.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 971
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:04·2026-09-30 20:55 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 979
  • Team average: 992 against 1027.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 972
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:09:29·2026-09-30 20:32 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Team average: 996 against 1169.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 979
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:56·2026-09-30 19:42 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 987
  • Team average: 978 against 1013.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 980
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:14:40·2026-09-30 18:24 UTC