← Home

Salorth

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,080 / 2,000 XP
920 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Elves
RotWKMAIN
Isengard
RotWK
Men
RotWK
Dwarves
RotWK

Ladders

RotWKPatch 2.02 · 2 versus 2
1000
ELO
#252
6W 7L · 46%
RotWKPatch 2.02 · 3 versus 3
991
ELO
#181
0W 1L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Chomper
6W 8L, 43% over 14 games
Chomper
6W 8L
43%
fefo
0W 1L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Chomper & Salorth
6W 7L
46%
Chomper & fefo & Salorth
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
AKRAMGAMER & KJR01
3W 0L
100%
Guizz & Sody 1 09
0W 3L
0%
8 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

No achievements yet.
LRotWKUdun IIHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 997 against 977.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Elves3 versus 300:08:272026-09-05 20:33 UTC
LRotWKMoonglade ValeHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1011
  • Team average: 1011 against 1037.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1003
Elves2 versus 200:10:552026-09-04 17:14 UTC
LRotWKNear KhandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 977
  • Team average: 977 against 986.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 968
Isengard2 versus 200:10:262026-08-26 19:12 UTC
LRotWKRiver RunningHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 987
  • Team average: 987 against 953.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 977
Isengard2 versus 200:32:372026-08-26 18:25 UTC
LRotWKSouth MirkwoodHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 983
  • Team average: 983 against 1044.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 977
Dwarves2 versus 200:20:252026-08-26 17:33 UTC
LRotWKMoonglade ValeHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 988
  • Team average: 988 against 1063.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 983
Men2 versus 200:10:362026-08-26 17:08 UTC
LRotWKHobbiton HillHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 994
  • Team average: 994 against 1057.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 988
Men2 versus 200:11:192026-08-26 16:53 UTC
LRotWKSouth HollinHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1051.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 994
Men2 versus 200:09:022026-08-26 16:42 UTC