← Home

mk today

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 416,680 / 20,000 XP
3,320 XP to level 5
FACTION LEVELS
Rohan
BFME1MAIN
Isengard
BFME1
Gondor
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

Ladders

BFME1Patch 2.22 · 3 versus 3
1075
ELO
#68
34W 27L · 56%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 1 versus 1
1009
ELO
#273
1W 0L · 100%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 2 versus 2
1003
ELO
#281
1W 1L · 50%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · FFA
994
ELO
#278
0W 3L · 0%
BFME1Patch 2.22 · 4 versus 4
984
ELO
#355
0W 3L · 0%

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Rohannn.
5W 0L, 100% over 5 games
Sakura
40W 66L
38%
otabok
5W 16L
24%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
mk today & Sakura
22W 31L
42%
mk today & otabok & Sakura
4W 9L
31%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
1magomedov6 & BamBuk & radzhab500
2W 2L
50%
Frodo & PASTOR
0W 4L
0%
62 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 100 games and keep your account a year or more.
Of the Elder Days
2.8% of players
Play 100 ranked games.
Ranger of the North
Level 1 of 4
8.2% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1HarlondHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1008
  • Team average: 1007 against 1088.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1003
Isengard·2 versus 2·00:13:03·2026-10-23 20:39 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1075
  • Team average: 1020 against 1064.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1068
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:06·2026-10-23 20:27 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1070
  • Team average: 1065 against 1189.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 1067
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:14·2026-10-23 10:25 UTC
LBFME1FFA BucklandHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 997
  • Free for all, rated against 1040. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 994
Isengard·FFA·00:30:55·2026-10-22 12:23 UTC
LBFME1BelfalasHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 998
  • Free for all, rated against 1247. Each opponent counts on its own.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 997
Isengard·FFA·00:31:32·2026-10-22 11:26 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1059
  • Team average: 969 against 1133.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1058
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:22:24·2026-10-22 10:56 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1043
  • Team average: 1025 against 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -7.
  • Rating after: 1036
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:33·2026-10-20 15:19 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1053
  • Team average: 1018 against 981.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -10.
  • Rating after: 1043
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:05·2026-10-20 15:04 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1057
  • Team average: 1018 against 1043.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1049
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:14·2026-10-07 16:49 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1043
  • Team average: 1007 against 1268.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1042
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:19:24·2026-10-06 18:00 UTC